Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
More Tory Lies
Unemployment Down , Wages Up, More, Tory Lies Up.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gulliver1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
//I think the best method to attack the tories is to discus and debate austerity and starter homes.//
So the topic under debate here, then, has been quietly ditched since the accusation of "Tory Lies" was established to be simply, er… lies.
//Love this thread one of my best Ever.//
Nice to see you're so easily amused. Post up some more rubbish and I'll see what I can do to demolish it - if I'm not too busy.
So the topic under debate here, then, has been quietly ditched since the accusation of "Tory Lies" was established to be simply, er… lies.
//Love this thread one of my best Ever.//
Nice to see you're so easily amused. Post up some more rubbish and I'll see what I can do to demolish it - if I'm not too busy.
//"You have been proven to be entirely wrong"
No i haven't.//
I think you have:
//10:27 - How the tories assess unemployment is warped. If you work 1 hour a week they class you as employed. They did this new scheme to get the numbers down without actually doing *** all.//
The Tories don’t assess it. The ONS measures it. The Tories don’t class someone like that as employed, the international standard of 1982 does. It is not a new scheme.
//10:35 - It's not "rubbish"
If you think picking up half a day’s work a fortnight is interpreted as being in work then you'd be a conservative.
I think that ideology is shocking.//
Clearly it [your 10:27 post] is rubbish (see above). It not an ideology, it is an internationally agreed method of measurement, 37 years old and nothing to do with the Tories, either now or in the past.
Your remarks at 10:39 and 10:52 I dealt with in my earlier post.
I agree (as I said) that classing people who work so few hours is not very helpful for many purposes (though I couldn't suggest what hours of work should qualify for someone to be "employed"). I also repeat that I do not believe there are too many people working just one hour a week. But that isn’t the issue. The issue is that Gulliver posted this under “Tory Lies” and you have attempted to perpetuate that assumption. What you have said to support it has been comprehensively shown to be rubbish. Best to stop digging and retire gracefully from this one.
No i haven't.//
I think you have:
//10:27 - How the tories assess unemployment is warped. If you work 1 hour a week they class you as employed. They did this new scheme to get the numbers down without actually doing *** all.//
The Tories don’t assess it. The ONS measures it. The Tories don’t class someone like that as employed, the international standard of 1982 does. It is not a new scheme.
//10:35 - It's not "rubbish"
If you think picking up half a day’s work a fortnight is interpreted as being in work then you'd be a conservative.
I think that ideology is shocking.//
Clearly it [your 10:27 post] is rubbish (see above). It not an ideology, it is an internationally agreed method of measurement, 37 years old and nothing to do with the Tories, either now or in the past.
Your remarks at 10:39 and 10:52 I dealt with in my earlier post.
I agree (as I said) that classing people who work so few hours is not very helpful for many purposes (though I couldn't suggest what hours of work should qualify for someone to be "employed"). I also repeat that I do not believe there are too many people working just one hour a week. But that isn’t the issue. The issue is that Gulliver posted this under “Tory Lies” and you have attempted to perpetuate that assumption. What you have said to support it has been comprehensively shown to be rubbish. Best to stop digging and retire gracefully from this one.
Some users on here are die hard conservative voters and you can tell. For example, I started a thread about the fact that the 2015 affordable housing promise was completely ignored, the thread soon turned onto Spath and his profession rather than any political discussion. It's that attitude, the.. Who cares what 'they' do, when Jeremy, or you do / have done this/ fail to live by these means.