Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Prince Andrew
139 Answers
Breaking news Prince Andrew to step back from public duties.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.barsel, I was referring mainly to the part you omitted from your answer.
\\ How do you know he hasn't committed anything illegally through his contact with Epstein and the contacts he was given through him? How do you know about all the deals he will have made with these contacts, do you think they were all legal? If you do, then you must be very naive.//
You seem very sure of illegality taking place, do you have any evidence?
\\ How do you know he hasn't committed anything illegally through his contact with Epstein and the contacts he was given through him? How do you know about all the deals he will have made with these contacts, do you think they were all legal? If you do, then you must be very naive.//
You seem very sure of illegality taking place, do you have any evidence?
there seems to be some question as to how long he had known Epstein, he said in the interview i think, that
it was around 1999, but a letter from Buckingham Palace shows that he knew him much earlier somewhere around 1990. If he can miss out 9 years then he can miss out on other things. Lying can get you into all sorts of bother, heavens help him if he goes to USA. They will hang him out to dry.
it was around 1999, but a letter from Buckingham Palace shows that he knew him much earlier somewhere around 1990. If he can miss out 9 years then he can miss out on other things. Lying can get you into all sorts of bother, heavens help him if he goes to USA. They will hang him out to dry.
what i was alluding to, interesting...
https:/ /www.ne wsweek. com/pri nce-and rew-fir st-met- jeffrey -epstei n-early -1990s- 1473030
https:/
diddlydo
/// Hi Gulliver - I note that this post has remained in "News" despite there being no link to a news article. Your post which is now in Politics was apparently moved as it had no link. Clearly one rule for the right-wing and a different one for the left. ///
I am surprised that the editor hasn't popped in and took you to task over your false accusation that answerbank has one rule for the left and one for the right.
Regarding the lack of a link to my news story at that time the news had just been announced on the TV news and I wasn't able to provide a link, but canary was able to do so and I thanked her for doing so.
/// Hi Gulliver - I note that this post has remained in "News" despite there being no link to a news article. Your post which is now in Politics was apparently moved as it had no link. Clearly one rule for the right-wing and a different one for the left. ///
I am surprised that the editor hasn't popped in and took you to task over your false accusation that answerbank has one rule for the left and one for the right.
Regarding the lack of a link to my news story at that time the news had just been announced on the TV news and I wasn't able to provide a link, but canary was able to do so and I thanked her for doing so.
It's interesting that some AB'ers are keen to defend the Prince on the basis that he has 'done nothing wrong'.
In a legal sense, no charges have been levelled, but that is not to saw that his conduct has not been, and remains, deeply morally flawed, and in that sense, he has very much done something wrong.
In a legal sense, no charges have been levelled, but that is not to saw that his conduct has not been, and remains, deeply morally flawed, and in that sense, he has very much done something wrong.
In New York City, the age of consent for sex is 17 years old. This applies to men and women, and applies to both heterosexual and homosexual conduct. However, as in many other states, New York has allowances for minors who are below the age of consent but are close to the same age.
Even if he did (& you don't know that) there has no wrong been done
Even if he did (& you don't know that) there has no wrong been done
-- answer removed --
Khandro at what point will you realise P. Andrew is the son of the Queen of England and if he did sleep with a 17yr old, it would not be acceptable to not just our RF but to other Royal Families and some and I mean some world leaders. You cannot compare what other 17yr olds did at that age, it really doesn't compare.
I wish people wouldn't keep going on and on about ---'how can he afford this,that and the other'. He has money in his own right through investments, property holdings, he owns several London restaurants and stocks. He was 'gifted' the property he lives in in 2003 so why keep going on about how can he afford the lifestyle that he leads.