ChatterBank8 mins ago
Farage Says( Among Other Things)
He’ll abolish the House of Lords, I like what I’m hearing here
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If Corbyn had said he wanted to abolish the Lords he’d be accused of being a Trot and anti-British for being against tradition.
Since the abolition of hereditary Peers, the Lords is much improved. We need a second chamber to keep the Government in check, and it needs to be ‘professional’ not full of elected numpties. While the present system is far from perfect, it does mean that the Government is scrutinised by people who understand the problems because they are ex-ministers or people who have worked for (or against) politicians in their working lives.
Since the abolition of hereditary Peers, the Lords is much improved. We need a second chamber to keep the Government in check, and it needs to be ‘professional’ not full of elected numpties. While the present system is far from perfect, it does mean that the Government is scrutinised by people who understand the problems because they are ex-ministers or people who have worked for (or against) politicians in their working lives.
Abolishing the House Of Lords is throwing the baby out with the bath water
Who would vote in somebody they had never heard of ?
It is true that is used as a a reward for party loyalty and personal friendships etc, and this is wrong.
Used correctly nominees should be experts in their fields and not somebody necessarily known or popular with the general public. Ex politicians, economists, scientists, engineers, philosophers, ex university lecturers, Community Activists, ex Policemen etc etc etc. A body of expertise in all fields unknown to the
Public capable of legislative scrutiny.
Reform not abolition.
Who would vote in somebody they had never heard of ?
It is true that is used as a a reward for party loyalty and personal friendships etc, and this is wrong.
Used correctly nominees should be experts in their fields and not somebody necessarily known or popular with the general public. Ex politicians, economists, scientists, engineers, philosophers, ex university lecturers, Community Activists, ex Policemen etc etc etc. A body of expertise in all fields unknown to the
Public capable of legislative scrutiny.
Reform not abolition.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.