mushroom - // the difference with HS2 is that it's not a "vanity" project - at least not entirely. //
Seriously?????
Given that successive governments and privatised companies have consistently proven themselves to be utterly incapable of running the rail system they have got, or effectively and on-budget and on time, build the Cross-Rail project, why on earth should the tax payer be funding yet more pie-in-the-sky nonsense like HS2?
The current network is, and always has been, chronically under-funded and resourced.
The simple fact is, if you privatise a utility, it ceases to function for service, and starts to function for profit.
That means that everyone develops severe tunnel (no pun intended!) vision, focusing on profit and cost saving, not delivery of service, because the raison d'etre ceases to be the provision of something the nation needs and uses, and becomes something that generates cash for share holders, and bonuses for executives.
If the budget for HS2 was given to upgrade the existing infrastructure, with longer platforms and fully maintained track and signaling, and new rolling stock, the whole thing could be transformed within a few years.
Currently, any spend for maintenance and replacement has to be wrung out of a reluctant organisation that wants to keep every penny in its share dividends, and not spend it on actually running the rail network. That means work is done as cheaply as possible, by the cheapest contractors working weekdays only to save overtime, using cheap materials, and the result is a sticking plaster over a fatal wound.
And we now expect these people to design and run a new rail network from scratch and get it running on time under budget and providing solutions?
Dream on!!!!