Donate SIGN UP

Answers

221 to 240 of 290rss feed

First Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next Last

Avatar Image
I wouldn't depend on the tabloids to report the truth.... especially when they're on the warpath against someone.
01:15 Tue 03rd Mar 2020
// Quick poll. Was it right that TR should have videod his daughter and posted this on line given the nature of the allegation?//

jo Barmaid
didnt realise that -

having been the wrong end of allegations - police investigate with unbridled enthusiasm, and do fair-play procedures like invite you to refute unproven statements.... this wasnt done here.

hmm is it in the childs best interests ?
I will have to think about that one - - URL ?
As I understand it, there is a video of Robinson asking his daughter about the alleged assault.

If folk want to go looking for it, that is up to them but I don't think it wise to post a link to it on here since it involves a child.
oh seen the viddy

it is basically a disclosure interview the first interview is most important and should be done by trained persons and I think coaching is obvious here

It means that Tommy has torn it and we will really never know the truth.
//wise to post a link to it on here since it involves a child.//

that is the internet equiv of "it is on the front page of the Times but dont read it!" - google tommy robinson daughter video

odd that this coincides with another thread on whether a parent should be present at a disclosure interview
here on AB but dont worry folks I wont tell you sensitive lot where it is !
PP, using your example, if folk want you buy a copy of The Times or view it online, that is up to them to make the effort to do so.
THECORBYLOON
Spicerack posted the video on the first page, but YouTube have taken it down.
Seems like a very strange thing for SYL to do. It was unclear when it was recorded, but it appeared to be in the Center’s changing room. So it was either before the thump or after the thump but before his arrest.
I thought that video showed only Robinson being arrested but I'm obviously wrong from what you say.
TCL the video I saw which Spicerack posted showed TR "interviewing" his daughter. You couldn't see her but could clearly hear her. I'm glad it's been taken down.

What a tool he is. As I said earlier I have every sympathy with a father protecting his daughter but one has to question the way he goes about things.
The TR video clearly shows what an obnoxious person TR is. Epic fail tommy- although I'm sure his supporters will lap it up
'Hitler only had one ball' .....Gawd, why the publicity - just send him down.
Unbelievable how many on this thread are more interested in the punishment Tommy Robinson may get rather than wanting to know if an eitht year old child has been sexually assaulted.

If I'm a TR fan, supporter, fanboy for expressing my views what does that make all those not interested in the truth of the sexual assault allegation?


paedophile apologists?
There should have been two objectives:
1. Report the alleged molester to the Center and to the Police.
2. Protect his young daughter’s anonymity and not put her in the media spotlight.

By committing a crime and getting arrested, he ensured the incident was in all the newspapers and TV, Radio and internet.
And then he film and published his daughter, thereby ensuring she is easily identified as the alleged victim.

He couldn’t have got the incident more wrong, if he had tried.
Of course we want to see strong action taken if sexual assault is proven. But TR is just obnoxious and goes about things in the wrong way- punching people, screaming at the police, encouraging supporters to attend his trial, posting the interview with his child
Of course we want to see strong action taken if sexual assault is proven.



Not many have expressed that view.
All together now

'But it goes without saying'
If the 'abuser' cannot be successfully prosecuted (because of Tommy Robinson's obsession with posting his every utterance) and he ends up in a swimming-pool next to one of your female 8-year family members, you'll shake your head indulgently and just think, "Tut, that Tommy Robinson, eh...?"
So what's your point, roy?

Anyway, TR has messed this up big time and may have reduced the chances of a conviction. (Sound familiar?)
royfromaus

We are interested in the sexual assault allegation.
With all the CCTV in the Center, pool surrounded by Lifeguards and lots of parents in the pool supervising their children, it should be very easy to prove the truth.

IF it happened under water in the pool it may not be possible to see it. I'm not sure if the man was in the pool or it happened close to the pool but not in it. Does anybody know?
I have no idea what planet you are on, Gromit but most of what you have posted is absolute tosh.

You are just making up your own conspiracies.
Gromit posts
We are interested in the sexual assault allegation.
With all the CCTV in the Center, pool surrounded by Lifeguards and lots of parents in the pool supervising their children, it should be very easy to prove the truth.


Earlier Gromit posts
And filming and photography at the pool or changing area is strictly forbidden, so the video of his daughter was not allowed.

221 to 240 of 290rss feed

First Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Tommy In Trouble Again...

Answer Question >>

Related Questions