roy - // andy
'Without him, there would have been no Buddy Holly and no Beatles'
and andy
'As I have explained, I would not suggest that any one musician is crucial to the formation of any group - that is clearly not true.' //
A fair point - I have directly contradicted myself, which is careless of me.
I have thought about it, and my redefined position is this -
no one musician or group can ever be said to be directly and only responsible for the formation of, or musical style of any other musician or group.
The concept of influence is often subliminal and complex, and although broad similarities exist - as in the urgent rock and roll of Little Richard and others, and the music made in their early days by The Beatles, it would be inaccurate to suggest that Little Richard's influence was so over-reaching, that without it, The Beatles would not have have been th group they became.
I am never beyond being inaccurate, or mistaken, and I think in this instance I was both - and appreciate your input.