Motoring3 mins ago
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by diddlydo. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Wrong - we are enduring these stupid measures to keep the R number below 1 for a few weeks just so Boris can gloat and say "Well I gave you the liberty to behave recklessly at Christmas" prior to a further lockdown in January when cases soar yet again. I suppose utter madness we should now take for granted from this so-called government.
not only those two very good answers but also to be able to have a bit more freedom over christmas. To avoid the R going well above 1 caused by people getting together, as much headroom as possible is needed beforehand....so you make massive effort before christmas so when (not if) the infection by number rate climbs, there will be space for that without the infection growth rate (R number) booming out of control.
I do wonder why these things need explaining? surely its obvious?
I do wonder why these things need explaining? surely its obvious?
Diddly, while I don't agree with everything this government has done, and when.... which other do you imagine would have done any better, and kept everyone happy all the time?
I don't think it has much to do with which party... any government would need to be "seen" to be doing the right thing, and not suggesting they don't care about lives. Who would have been better? And how?
I don't think it has much to do with which party... any government would need to be "seen" to be doing the right thing, and not suggesting they don't care about lives. Who would have been better? And how?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.