Quizzes & Puzzles5 mins ago
Ok Let's Do The Usual Dance.......
323 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
In response to a comment from Sunk, Tora gave his reasoning for the wording of the OP.
//sunk: "Why not just wait for the facts to be revealed? " - what and miss all the fun? I love watching the handwringers getting all in a lather as they desperately hope it won't be the fluffy bunny muslims whilst at the same time knowing it almost certainly is.//
That is what stinks.
//sunk: "Why not just wait for the facts to be revealed? " - what and miss all the fun? I love watching the handwringers getting all in a lather as they desperately hope it won't be the fluffy bunny muslims whilst at the same time knowing it almost certainly is.//
That is what stinks.
roy - // I haven't done an about-face so there's nothing regarding that to discuss. //
I have pointed out that you have - and how you have done it, but you want to pretend you didn't, then carry on.
Not being willing to acknowledge your mistakes doesn't really enhance your reputation for future debates, but that's your call.
I have pointed out that you have - and how you have done it, but you want to pretend you didn't, then carry on.
Not being willing to acknowledge your mistakes doesn't really enhance your reputation for future debates, but that's your call.
Atheist,//please think about your words.//
No - YOU think about my words. "Any single person who has any connection whatsoever to terrorism" does not equate to any person who has any connection to a terrorist. ‘Terrorism’ is an act. A ‘terrorist’ is a person, and the people around a terrorist, if they are not involved in his acts of terrorism cannot and should not be tarred with the same brush - so no, family members not involved in acts of terrorism would not be locked up. I trust you understand that now.
Pixie, //naomi means "terrorists", but uses words like "Islam" or "muslim" instead.//
Of course I do, because I say what I mean - and Sajid Javid doesn’t mince his words either. See my link at 11.54.
I’ve nothing further to add.
No - YOU think about my words. "Any single person who has any connection whatsoever to terrorism" does not equate to any person who has any connection to a terrorist. ‘Terrorism’ is an act. A ‘terrorist’ is a person, and the people around a terrorist, if they are not involved in his acts of terrorism cannot and should not be tarred with the same brush - so no, family members not involved in acts of terrorism would not be locked up. I trust you understand that now.
Pixie, //naomi means "terrorists", but uses words like "Islam" or "muslim" instead.//
Of course I do, because I say what I mean - and Sajid Javid doesn’t mince his words either. See my link at 11.54.
I’ve nothing further to add.
roy - // Why does the amazing andy hughes think he knows what goes on in my head better than I do? //
I have no idea what goes on in your head - only what goes through your keyboard and onto this site.
I confine myself to commenting on that - with the occasional reasonable supposition.
I'd hardly equate that with knowing what goes on in your head.
And don't imagine for a moment that I'd want to know either! Based on what you say on here, there's not a lot to get excited about!!
But you are doing a good job of distracting from talking about your change of view ...
I have no idea what goes on in your head - only what goes through your keyboard and onto this site.
I confine myself to commenting on that - with the occasional reasonable supposition.
I'd hardly equate that with knowing what goes on in your head.
And don't imagine for a moment that I'd want to know either! Based on what you say on here, there's not a lot to get excited about!!
But you are doing a good job of distracting from talking about your change of view ...
Mozz - // Mamya, and that is also the perfect example of the trolling I spoke about and which Andy didn't see. //
I think the term 'trolling' has different meanings to different people.
In this instance of the thread we are discussing, I don;t believe it was 'trolling' in the sense that contravenes Site Rules - I would have removed it if i did.
Apparently the Editorial Team and all the other Moderators agree, because the thread is still there, despite ample opportunities for its deletion.
I think the term 'trolling' has different meanings to different people.
In this instance of the thread we are discussing, I don;t believe it was 'trolling' in the sense that contravenes Site Rules - I would have removed it if i did.
Apparently the Editorial Team and all the other Moderators agree, because the thread is still there, despite ample opportunities for its deletion.
-- answer removed --
