Where Is The Real Fault Here?

[ToraToraTora]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-57260509
Could it possibly be our TROB approach to crime and non-punishment? Surely the savage should not have been out on the streets in the first place. Blaming the security services is like blaming the sheep dog for not rounding up all the sheep after you let them out.

[ToraToraTora]

AH: "Find me one post on any thread where I have apologised for the actions of a terrorist - not a Muslim terrorist, any terrorist will do, and I will apologise in big capital letters." - How about this one? I don't mean, as I'm sure you know, that you come right out and back terrorism. I mean that you straight away come out and defend the religion that cultivates this kind of thing. Usually with some twee derivation like it's because they are psychopaths not because they are muslim. It's a bit of both.

[ToraToraTora]

were the 911 terrorists psychopaths or were they an organised unit attacking the infidel with the backing of their religious leaders?

[Togo]

It is what happens when the appointed "minders" leave the mentally unstable, amongst us, to their own devices for a while.

[davebro]

Ellipsis - you missed out "IF he killed because he was psychopath"

I don't think he was - I think he was a murderous fanatic who believed in a warped idea of Islam and thought his destiny was to murder infidels and enjoy the delights of numerous virgins in heaven.
All those who think that should be given the earliest opportunity.

[ToraToraTora]

we should change the law so these savages never see the light of day, end of.

[THECORBYLOON]

TORATORATORA, you have failed to provide any evidence to support previous, similar claims. Why do you continue to make these offensive allegations?

You have stated previously,

"In my experience a good way to test the veracity of someone's opinion is by how willing they are to put their money where their mouth is."

I wonder if he would be willing to wager money on there being evidence to support the "apologist" claim?

[ToraToraTora]

davebro: "Ellipsis - you missed out "IF he killed because he was psychopath"
I don't think he was - I think he was a murderous fanatic who believed in a warped idea of Islam and thought his destiny was to murder infidels and enjoy the delights of numerous virgins in heaven.
All those who think that should be given the earliest opportunity." - bang on dave, that's how I see it, they think they are doing the work of Allah.

[ToraToraTora]

here we go, thread dissection has started.

[THECORBYLOON]

"here we go, thread dissection has started"

I think that means, "My claim is baseless and I am not willing to wager a penny on its veracity."

[Mozz71]

//here we go, thread dissection has started//

Isn't that what we do on AB?

[Mozz71]

Here we go, poor, bullied TTT, playing the victim once again after having something preposterous removed by admin.

[ToraToraTora]

no mozz I just think it ruins a thread when key points are removed, don't you?

[Mozz71]

They remove the answers they deem violate the Site Rules. If you don't want ti be censored, play nice. Simple.

[ToraToraTora]

...see what I mean?

[THECORBYLOON]

Okay, are you willing to put some money where your mouth is?

[Mozz71]

It does, but I also understand why some posts have to be removed. It ain't rocket science.

[ToraToraTora]

mozz: "They remove the answers they deem violate the Site Rules. If you don't want ti be censored, play nice. Simple." - if only that were true, the rules only apply to some of us.