News4 mins ago
I'm Probably Going To Get A Lot Of T R O B Hysterics For Even Questioning This But.....
92 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-wales -574450 53
...is this wise?
...is this wise?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Thanks mozz71...I would never have guessed that!
By the way...interesting link. I didn't know the procedure being followed when giving blood.
This puts it into perspective:
https:/ /www.bl ood.co. uk/who- can-giv e-blood /men-wh o-have- sex-wit h-men/
By the way...interesting link. I didn't know the procedure being followed when giving blood.
This puts it into perspective:
https:/
Paigntonian
You can't completely. People can lie, but surely someone who elects to give blood is unlikely to be someone who wants to give tainted blood?
Are blood donors life's 'good guys'?
Also - the blood is tested. Apparently we have some of the safest blood in the world.
But yes - potentially people could lie.
You can't completely. People can lie, but surely someone who elects to give blood is unlikely to be someone who wants to give tainted blood?
Are blood donors life's 'good guys'?
Also - the blood is tested. Apparently we have some of the safest blood in the world.
But yes - potentially people could lie.
Well Naomi, it's a very simple answer. Yes, it's perfectly wise and there is absolutely no need to worry as long as all blood, regardless of the sexuality of the donor, is checked, which I hope it will be.
Shall we address the elephant in the room? Clearly Tora is talking about the risk of blood being infected with HIV. HIV is not a "gay disease" any more. As I said earlier, it isn't 1984. There is just as much risk of infection from a hetrosexual couple as the is from a gay couple. All blood needs to be checked, that's the only way to avoid contamination.
Shall we address the elephant in the room? Clearly Tora is talking about the risk of blood being infected with HIV. HIV is not a "gay disease" any more. As I said earlier, it isn't 1984. There is just as much risk of infection from a hetrosexual couple as the is from a gay couple. All blood needs to be checked, that's the only way to avoid contamination.
I would imagine that companies who specialises in Autologous blood banking may well be looking at increased business. I remember, many years ago reading a sci-fi novel where it was compulsory for everyone to subscribe to a personal blood bank for future use. It was a crime to take someone else's blood or to administer it. I will come. Experiments already take place on mice where older mice are given their own blood from when they were much younger. These mice are healthier and live much longer.
ymb, does it need discussing? it seems a fait accompli to me, not a consultation. anyone unwell enough to need a blood transfusion is hardly going to refuse (IMO)
paintonian "How on earth can you rely on what people claim about their sexual relationships?" well, that's what the blood transfusion service has been doing for many many years - this is no different (unless you are suggesting that gay men are less trustworthy than other people?)
paintonian "How on earth can you rely on what people claim about their sexual relationships?" well, that's what the blood transfusion service has been doing for many many years - this is no different (unless you are suggesting that gay men are less trustworthy than other people?)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.