I’ve read the transcript but I’m not sure how anyone could be ‘forced’ to have sex at 17 yrs old unless they had a gun to her head, otherwise this would surely be rape wouldn’t it?
I’m no fan of PA, far from it but again just wondered how she was ‘forced’ to have sex with him and other prominent figures,and I’m not saying she’s to blame either but I would like to know
I don’t think he has any reason to “man up” (although yes I still think he’s a toad). There ought to be no charge. What happened happened. It was poor judgement on BOTH sides. At 17 she took a choice. A choice which an older wiser her wld not have made. She was young n dumb but had free will. He was older n wiser but thought with his ***. Nothing more complicated than...
IMHO, at the time Ms Guiffre must have believed there was something in it for her. Enhancement of lifestyle, perhaps?
Later in life, Ms Guiffre must believe there is something in it for her. Compensation, perhaps?
bobbisox it depends if she was a sex worker or if she was trafficked for the purpose of sex there is a difference i do not think Virginia roberts was a sex worker at the age of 17 but maybe she was i guess it is word for word ironically im less inclined to believe the words of royal andrew he has a bad vibe about him very odd man
im sorry sqad i do not know what intersperse means but dont be sorry all is fine
Danny who knows what these influential powers can do people think Epstein was killed in high security suicide watch prison im pretty sure they could exterminate Virginia if they wanted to
Epstein was a seedy man that is facts any one who ended up on his island who was under the age of 18 i do feel very sorry for them
roadman......neither do I -;) me just trying to appear intelligent.
There is a difference in my opinion between trafficking and prostitution in that the former implies a degree of physical enforcement which is not necessarily involved in prostitution.
I have seen no evidence to suggest that in this case physical elements had any part to play.
well boys and gurlz I can see you are all having fun
and Sqad's posts havent gone down the Jarn (yet) as they did yesterday so that is a plus.
// Why mention it then? // AH this time
the stuff we dont know - - is mentioned / alluded to and brings out the fact we will never know all the facts ( that the court will)
and we can seek after the truth but perhaps not find it
I am glad that people have stopped saying - "I disagree with what you say so I will stop you saying it" - - - straight from the Giuffre case - one side only heard. - which then carries the day.
Oh can we STOP saying the randy one must answer the charges - he doesnt - THEY have to prove their allegations
and I note that Giuffre is the subject of allegations of perjury ( same jurisdiction ) - for those who have got down to this point - thank you for reading thus far
It is an intriguing story. They say the picture is doctored and it does look suspect, can you see that with his angle standing next to her he should not be able to get his hand on her hips as it shown.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.