Sport1 min ago
Prince Andrew (Enough Said)
https:/
I’ve read the transcript but I’m not sure how anyone could be ‘forced’ to have sex at 17 yrs old unless they had a gun to her head, otherwise this would surely be rape wouldn’t it?
I’m no fan of PA, far from it but again just wondered how she was ‘forced’ to have sex with him and other prominent figures,and I’m not saying she’s to blame either but I would like to know
I’ve read the transcript but I’m not sure how anyone could be ‘forced’ to have sex at 17 yrs old unless they had a gun to her head, otherwise this would surely be rape wouldn’t it?
I’m no fan of PA, far from it but again just wondered how she was ‘forced’ to have sex with him and other prominent figures,and I’m not saying she’s to blame either but I would like to know
Answers
I don’t think he has any reason to “man up” (although yes I still think he’s a toad). There ought to be no charge. What happened happened. It was poor judgement on BOTH sides. At 17 she took a choice. A choice which an older wiser her wld not have made. She was young n dumb but had free will. He was older n wiser but thought with his ***. Nothing more complicated than...
08:19 Tue 10th Aug 2021
naomi - // Was her personality damaged? I don't think so. I think she thought she was on to a good thing - which is why she went back for more. //
I have no idea - only she and the people concerned can answer that question.
I think the notion that she was 'on to a good thing' and 'went back for more' is possibly inaccurate, but again, we cannot know.
I have no idea - only she and the people concerned can answer that question.
I think the notion that she was 'on to a good thing' and 'went back for more' is possibly inaccurate, but again, we cannot know.
naomi - // AH, //I have no idea - only she and the people concerned can answer that question. //
Why mention it then? //
I was trying, without being confrontational, to suggest that I don't know, in exactly the same way that you don't know.
The difference is, you are using your interpretation of what you have heard to reach a negative moral judgement.
Why mention it then? //
I was trying, without being confrontational, to suggest that I don't know, in exactly the same way that you don't know.
The difference is, you are using your interpretation of what you have heard to reach a negative moral judgement.
bobbisox it depends if she was a sex worker or if she was trafficked for the purpose of sex there is a difference i do not think Virginia roberts was a sex worker at the age of 17 but maybe she was i guess it is word for word ironically im less inclined to believe the words of royal andrew he has a bad vibe about him very odd man
im sorry sqad i do not know what intersperse means but dont be sorry all is fine
im sorry sqad i do not know what intersperse means but dont be sorry all is fine
More news that makes this woman look like a fantasist.Why has she waited 11 years to make these allegations? Saying that she feared she would be killed is simply unbelievable.
https:/
https:/
Danny who knows what these influential powers can do people think Epstein was killed in high security suicide watch prison im pretty sure they could exterminate Virginia if they wanted to
Epstein was a seedy man that is facts any one who ended up on his island who was under the age of 18 i do feel very sorry for them
Epstein was a seedy man that is facts any one who ended up on his island who was under the age of 18 i do feel very sorry for them
roadman......neither do I -;) me just trying to appear intelligent.
There is a difference in my opinion between trafficking and prostitution in that the former implies a degree of physical enforcement which is not necessarily involved in prostitution.
I have seen no evidence to suggest that in this case physical elements had any part to play.
There is a difference in my opinion between trafficking and prostitution in that the former implies a degree of physical enforcement which is not necessarily involved in prostitution.
I have seen no evidence to suggest that in this case physical elements had any part to play.
well boys and gurlz I can see you are all having fun
and Sqad's posts havent gone down the Jarn (yet) as they did yesterday so that is a plus.
// Why mention it then? // AH this time
the stuff we dont know - - is mentioned / alluded to and brings out the fact we will never know all the facts ( that the court will)
and we can seek after the truth but perhaps not find it
I am glad that people have stopped saying - "I disagree with what you say so I will stop you saying it" - - - straight from the Giuffre case - one side only heard. - which then carries the day.
Oh can we STOP saying the randy one must answer the charges - he doesnt - THEY have to prove their allegations
and I note that Giuffre is the subject of allegations of perjury ( same jurisdiction ) - for those who have got down to this point - thank you for reading thus far
and Sqad's posts havent gone down the Jarn (yet) as they did yesterday so that is a plus.
// Why mention it then? // AH this time
the stuff we dont know - - is mentioned / alluded to and brings out the fact we will never know all the facts ( that the court will)
and we can seek after the truth but perhaps not find it
I am glad that people have stopped saying - "I disagree with what you say so I will stop you saying it" - - - straight from the Giuffre case - one side only heard. - which then carries the day.
Oh can we STOP saying the randy one must answer the charges - he doesnt - THEY have to prove their allegations
and I note that Giuffre is the subject of allegations of perjury ( same jurisdiction ) - for those who have got down to this point - thank you for reading thus far
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.