Donate SIGN UP

Answers

21 to 40 of 77rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by webbo3. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Andrew is a bit dim, and fell for this obvious sting.

The girl is lying for the money.

Hardly surprising they got together, they deserve each other.
mans has no honour, should own up and be counted, if there's nothing in it, fair enough.. nothing for him to erm worry about.
I guess he’s daft enough to believe he’s fooling everyone.
// In contrast, Virginia Giuffre have said that Prince Andrews have obstructed their enquiries at every turn. I wonder who is telling the truth.//

I dont : the Prince. Virginir G lawyers have been grandstanding giving interviews to the media who have swallowed their ( lies ) hook like and sinker. That includes his duty to speak in public, his duty to to the land of the free ( paid by himself ) his duty to incriminate himself ( hold it, really, they said that?) his duty to answer all and every question including those not yet asked or thought of.

I have had words with the Beeb about their open mouthed and gormless acceptance of American lawyers opinions as Gospel truth when it comes to English Law. I think the stated duty to incriminate himself struck home - oh and extradition. Even the dimmest Beeb fluff ( I pointed out to them) should have wonderd if they were over egging the pudding.
and so the latest report is deffo muted

The word in the gutter is that they were stalking the Prince in order to do a "Your majesty you are well and truly served ! and American Justice will prevail as God has ordained!" - on tee-vee , cameras running. ( Prince: o I say! see my valet! only my mother is her majesty by the way ! - - he never learns)

In fact the Prince has lawyers both sides ( no not bofe sides of the case silly!) and there are well known ways of serving ( to the apptd lawyers). The papers have been served on a police man and apparently they say in the robing rooms, that the pleading will be that this is not the English way and should therefore count as unserved.

Further lu-lu for the lawyers will revolve over whether summary judgement in a case in America is enforceable in London, and whether the case should be fought in London as it occurred there.

rtoodle pip boys and girls !
In another disgusting ploy for the plaintiff
and earning publicity and sympathy
it was announced on both sides of the Atlantic ( Meghan offered assistance in this) - that down trodden litigant Virginia J will be a contestant in The Great British Bake off

Two courses - slapped Ham - or perhaps undressed Ham
and then to follow Royal spotted duck.

The Palace have angrily denied footmen will assist
//the one person who will know the whole heap is Ghislaine Maxwell - she's the one and only as she was the procurer//

Only trial by media is needed for you then? Innocent until proven guilty out the window,
Personally I cant stand the man, especially as I am a Republican.

But, innocent until proven guilty and as yet I have seen nothing but guesswork from the media who seem to be finding him guilty, as are a few on here judging by the comments.

PA will have access to some of the best lawyers, it wont be him deciding what to do and as I suspect they feel there is no real evidence the best thing is to keep quiet and not dig any holes or say anything that will be twisted in social media.
He's arrogant enough to disregard even the best advice, though, ymf. Surely no-one actually advised him to do 'that' interview.
Gee- larne has got a perjury case to get up and run innit?

the phrase "inveterate liar" springs to mind - isnt it where a judge has said "this evidence is unbelievable?"

I am not sure who said what.

When the american lawyer said that PA had duty to come and be deposed in New York - Fluffy ( Beeb hack silly!) SHOULD have said: "that is not the case and you know it is not the case dont you?"
Here you go Ken

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/nov/17/who-were-the-main-players-behind-the-prince-andrew-interview

I'd have thought after that he was on lockdown though so will have to listen to his brief.
As i have said previously,get him to have the trial up here in Scotland.The juries up here let all the sex pests off.Just look at Salmond,and there was 14 accusers in his case.
I do agree he is arrogant though Ken.

But arrogance doesnt equal guilt.
And there you go ynnafymmi, that is why people should not be disclosed unless guilty. People like you prefer trial by social media to a proper jury.

Just out of interest did you go to the trial or are you relying on social media for your 'facts' of it?
Andrew is foolishly attempting to distance himself from everyone involved. Silly man.
Nah,just read about it in the papers.Seems there was 14(14?)accusers accusing Salmond of not actual rape,but just feeling them up all the time.Salmond got a very good lawyer and a very pliant jury and got off with it.
"As i have said previously,get him to have the trial up here in Scotland.The juries up here let all the sex pests off.Just look at Salmond,and there was 14 accusers in his case."

There were nine complainers not fourteen. There were fourteen charges, one of which was withdrawn later.

The case was heard by a Jury who listened to and seen the evidence presented whereas you have reached a conclusion based upon God knows what and you can't even get the number of complainers correct.

Could your opinion
be influenced by your rabid hatred of anything and anyone SNP-related?


So are you with Salmond or Sturgeon,TCL.The SNP feud is still ongoing isnt it.The£600,000 is still missing.I take it with your defence of the old p*** you are an Alba supporter.
// I'd have thought after that he was on lockdown though so will have to listen to his brief.//

no - he has an even dimmer brother by the way. No IQ test to be a Prince. - Times article - what to do in Balmoral.... The media havent been kind to him. Really simple things - underage in another jurisdiction is irrelevant in London. Well relevant in that he cant then be extradited ( has to be matched both countries ) - the commentators really should have clicked that THEY were being played. Naughty gormless easily-led journos - gullible, credulous, (er run out of insults)
I am pointing your lack of knowledge regarding that particular trial but that will not prevent you from divering future threads with your anti-SNP rants.

21 to 40 of 77rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Prince Andrew -You Are Served

Answer Question >>

Related Questions