/////
// we’re not talking about proportions or ratios are we?//
yes we are
/////
I don’t know how much simpler to put this Peter, but I’ll try just one more time before the kettle boils. The statement I responded to was this:
//Germany’s daily cases and deaths are almost identical to the UK, 40,000+ daily cases, and 150ish deaths a day. We are quite content to do nothing.//
“Cases are almost identical to….40,000+ daily cases”. Nothing about cases per million; nothing about cases per head of population; nothing about ratios; nothing about proportions; nothing about rates; nothing about relative populations. Simply the number of cases in each of the two countries. So, if you test more people you are likely to find more infections (provided the number of infections per head of the population is in the same ball park). If you test one person you can get a number of positives between 0 and 1. If you test 1,000,000 people you can get a number of positives between 0 and 1,000,000. So which survey is likely to result in the highest number of positives, do you think?
So, bearing in mind the above, what difference does this make:
//…but - we ( on AB) do know that there are more germans 83m than there are Brits 60m//
Your distain for posters on AB is well known (e.g. “But hey, this is AB on a wet Sunday in November after all”). You believe nobody has your level of intellect and understanding. That’s your privilege. But you really must stop treating posters as being thick as two short planks, Peter.