Jokes0 min ago
Should He Be Given Jail Or A Bigger Hammer?
104 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by royfromaus. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
//But since neither are, I believe, convicted of any offence, then reasons not to should not include any Mccarthy-ist judgement based on rumours and assumptions.//
Polanski is only unconvicted because he did a runner (Allen is a completely different case, I concede). My only point is that if the beeb have them on a banned list, why would they have a work by a confessed paedophile/animal abuser on their property? Seems a tad on the two-faced side.
Polanski is only unconvicted because he did a runner (Allen is a completely different case, I concede). My only point is that if the beeb have them on a banned list, why would they have a work by a confessed paedophile/animal abuser on their property? Seems a tad on the two-faced side.
Mozz - // My only point is that if the beeb have them on a banned list, why would they have a work by a confessed paedophile/animal abuser on their property? Seems a tad on the two-faced side. //
Since I don;t think they are on a 'banned' list, it would seem that there is no conflict in the BBC's position.
As to them having a work by a self confessed abuser - perhaps they adopt the same attitude that I do, and separate the art from the artist?
I have no idea, I simply float the suggestion for any comments.
I'll make one to start us off - I don't think the BBC are in a position to adopt that position without making it very clear very loudly that it is their position.
I can, because I am a private citizen with no power to influence anyone either way - they can't because they are the compete opposite in every sense - and publicly funded.
Since I don;t think they are on a 'banned' list, it would seem that there is no conflict in the BBC's position.
As to them having a work by a self confessed abuser - perhaps they adopt the same attitude that I do, and separate the art from the artist?
I have no idea, I simply float the suggestion for any comments.
I'll make one to start us off - I don't think the BBC are in a position to adopt that position without making it very clear very loudly that it is their position.
I can, because I am a private citizen with no power to influence anyone either way - they can't because they are the compete opposite in every sense - and publicly funded.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.