I understand the cut and thrust of political debate. However, given the recentish murders of two sitting MPs, and given the general stupidity of the population it behoves ALL MPs to take care with what they say about each other (including apologising if necessary)
PM: [to Starmer].
// failing to prosecute Starmer //
PM: [after a word from the Lawyers]
// I totally I totally understand that he had nothing to do personally with those decisions. understand that he had nothing to do personally with those decisions. //
// Some on the PM's own benches, including Commons defence committee chair Tobias Elwood, echoed the criticism, tweeting: "Let's stop this drift towards a Trumpian style of politics from becoming the norm." //
I understand the cut and thrust of political debate.
However, given the recentish murders of two sitting MPs, and given the general stupidity of the population it behoves ALL MPs to take care with what they say about each other (including apologising if necessary)
No point in apologising for nothing. Protesters of that sort will use any excuse, and apparently had many of them they were using that day. As for Boris' comment, as far as I know Mr, Savile wasn't ever prosecuted, so it was correct.
Boris should not Apologise....It's the members of the Public who voted Conservative that should Apologise for giving the UK the biggest manhood of a PM ever.
I know my memory is a bit faulty over some things but I seem to recall that Boris was forced to apologise over some inexcusable remarks he made about the relatives of Liverpool football supporters. He did this in a very reluctant back-handed and insincere way, I also seem to remember.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.