Donate SIGN UP

War News

Avatar Image
ichkeria | 10:36 Fri 25th Feb 2022 | News
157 Answers
War News
War News Part 2
War News Part Three
War News Part 4

I thought I would start a separate thread on the situation in Ukraine as several of the other related threads are getting a bit fractious and have long since deviated from the original question.
That isn't a criticism: it's human nature and shows we're free to argue.

This man was miraculously pulled from his car in Obolon (N Kyiv) after it was steamrollered by a Russian tank. The "denazification" process continues (!)

https://twitter.com/ww3_ukraine/status/1497156604260724736/photo/1

Answers

121 to 140 of 157rss feed

First Previous 4 5 6 7 8 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ichkeria. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Ich. I've just read that the UK is turning away, in Paris, Ukrainians who want to join family in the UK.
This is because they don't have a visa. Do you know if this is true?

Ireland has done away with the need for a visa and Ukrainians are arriving here to be with family. Has the UK not done this do you know?
the immigration minister has suggested there might be opportunities for them here as fruit pickers, gness

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/ukraine-refugees-priti-patel_uk_621b1c77e4b06e1cc5907767

They'd have to go home after the harvest is over, no doubt.
Oh dear god, Jno....I curse him too. :-(
Question Author
“Answer
Ich. I've just read that the UK is turning away, in Paris, Ukrainians who want to join family in the UK.
This is because they don't have a visa. Do you know if this is true?

Yes I saw something about this on the news. Something about the border checkpoints being in France, not the UK.
I didn’t totally follow.
They also interviewed a woman whose mother had come from Kharkiv but didn’t qualify for a visa as she wasn’t a dependent (her poor mother really didn’t want to come to the UK. She speaks no
English and wants to go home to Kharkiv. So sad), I trust this will get sorted. What with the fruit picking comments, some of this has been embarrassing
I hope it’s sorted. I read recently that the UK had made it more difficult to obtain a visa. I didn’t believe it but after the last couple of days I’m not so sure.
Some of the stories I’m reading are heartbreaking.
Boris said tonight we will
make it easier for Ukrainian refugees to come here and has pledged many millions of pounds.
As far as I'm aware, and I'm happy to be corrected on this, Johnson's pledge so far only extends to those Ukrainians who have immediate family members in the UK -- married partners, children, parents and so on. I hope, as I'm sure we all do, that the UK goes further on this quickly.
Johnson falls short again.....well no surprise there.
"Johnson falls short again.....well no surprise there."

Seems he's not alone.

///The Irish authorities have done themselves some credit by waiving visa requirements for Ukrainians joining family here as they flee the horrors of war.///

https://www.independent.ie/opinion/editorial/ireland-must-do-more-to-help-ukrainian-refugees-than-boost-morale-and-waive-visas-41392235.html
Question Author
Despite my wholehearted opposition to the PM before, I am right behind him now.
Fair enough to criticise and say "he must do more" - but I hate the petty politicking. It's not the time.
Quite a lot has changed in even the last 24 hours, with countries regularly shifting their positions ever-closer towards effectively unconditional support for Ukrainians. In that sense, I don't think that the present UK position, restricting passage from Ukraine to only those who have immediate family connections, will last very long.

A lot also depends of course on how long the War drags on. Assuming peace talks fail, which I fear is likely, then the situation will get more desperate still for Ukrainian citizens. But, in general, I think the UK's been at the forefront of Ukrainian support, diplomatically and militarily. I think it will change on this too in the next few days.
//I think the UK's been at the forefront of Ukrainian support, diplomatically and militarily. I think it will change on this too in the next few days.//

I don't think so.
Question Author
"Assuming peace talks fail, which I fear is likely"

That's a nailed-on certainty. Apparently the Russians are sending Medinsky, who's a bit of a dead loss all round. That probably is not a hiopeful sign they think there's a chance either.
Zelensky is now going to mobilise prisoners (Ukrainian ones!)
Which bit don't you agree with? The second, presumably -- but, if not, why not?

I can agree that if the Russian military pulls back unconditionally within the next week, then one can argue that such universal entry conditions for refugees would become unnecessary, and it would be better instead to pump money into Ukraine to help it rebuild. On the other hand, I think the changes of Russia pulling out so quickly are unlikely at the moment, since it would be tantamount to admitting a defeat for Putin, and as I have expressed elsewhere, such a humiliation would be the end of him. Therefore what's more likely is that the war drags on -- and, since nothing short of victory would satisfy Putin, that would lead to increasing numbers of Ukrainians being displaced. In that scenario, why would the UK wish to continue to restrict Ukrainian refugees from entering without a pre-existing immediate family connection? It would be unsustainable to justify this. Especially when the EU has already agreed to unconditional entry for Ukrainians for the next three years.



Jim, I don’t agree that the UK's position at the forefront will change.

//Especially when the EU has already agreed to unconditional entry for Ukrainians for the next three years.//

That's either untrue or Ireland is rebelling because they're certainly not offering that option. See my link at 09:13 Mon.
"Jim, I don’t agree that the UK's position at the forefront will change."

That's not what I said. The "this" in my sentence is clearly meant to be understood as the current position on refugees, as discussed in the first paragraph of that post.
Question Author
The situation is very concerning.
I think it is looking increasingly clear that Russia's invasion has stalled in many places. In some respects their failure would be seen as comical were it the time for making jokes. I saw a film of some unarmed civilians near Zaporizhzhya, in the SE, shouting at a Russian tank and effectively chasing it away.
Russia may have superior manpower but that manpower plainly is no match for Ukraine's. Their poor troops have been lied to about why they are there, and I think have been completely taken aback by the situation. They do of course have elite special forces but they are encountering the same problems.

Of course they will keep coming, but presumably the ones coming after are even less well trained or briefed.
But the big worry is Russia's superior weaponry and how much of it Putin is prepared to use.
Which bit don't you agree with? - - - I dont think it matters

How goes the war today Ich ? I cant see thro the smoke ( = lies)
Jim, //I think the UK's been at the forefront of Ukrainian support, diplomatically and militarily. I think it will change on this too in the next few days. //

'Ukrainian support, diplomatically and militarily' indicates rather more than a reference to refugees.

121 to 140 of 157rss feed

First Previous 4 5 6 7 8 Next Last