//Incidentally, the latest YouGov poll suggests the majority of people now think Brexit was a mistake, so time to drop the democratic will of the people stuff, I suggest.//
I have never suggested it was the "democratic will of the people". I have only ever said that the then government asked a question of the electorate in 2016 and ended its booklet (aimed at getting the electorate to vote to remain) by saying "This is your decision. The
Government will implement what you decide." So we decided, and our decision was implemented (after a struggle).
I'm not sure that can be interpreted as anything but "the democratic will of the people" but it's not a term I've ever used as far as I can recall.
That said, because it was the electorate's decision then, it may not be now. But that's hardly an issue. We cannot keep having referendums on the same thing every few months in case anybody has changed their mind. That's what the EU normally insists on. Which brings me to point two:
//I'm genuinely curious as to why you're so strongly pro-Brexit.//
This was done to death (by both sides) between 2016 and 2020. But a quick precis:
I am vehemently opposed to the European Union. I believe it is a protectionist racket which discriminates against both non-EU businesses and people. Its aim is to stifle competition between its members and to make their dealings with anybody else difficult, expensive or inconvenient (and often all three). Its treaties enable it to exercise considerable power over its members whilst exhibiting a remarkable democratic deficit. The European Parliament is a sham and is only a sop to democracy. MEPs have no power to originate legislation but can only approve it. Real power is vested in a small number of unelected bureaucrats. It also runs a giant wealth distribution scheme, sucking money from four (previously five) net contributors to be paid to the other 23 members, to be spent as directed. Its Single Currency is a disaster and has inflicted financial pain and even penury on people in a number of the "peripheral" (i.e. not France or Germany) users of the Euro. The Euro's ultimate disastrous consequences are yet to be enjoyed. The Eurocrats have expanded their areas of competence "salami style" - each step just a little different to what existed before, but which, when examined end-to-end, are enormous. It retains its powers by making it so difficult for members to leave because of their economic and political entwinement, that none try (except the UK).
There's lots more besides that, but that will have to do for you to be going on with. Hopefully you can understand that because I hold those views on the EU, what happens following our departure is of little consequence. I'm not all that interested if the price of beetroot trebles.