Donate SIGN UP

Starmer And Rayner Cleared. Will This Be Accepted By Right Wing Abers?

Avatar Image
Atheist | 20:24 Fri 08th Jul 2022 | News
84 Answers
Will this be accepted by right wing abers? Or will they play the MSM conspiracy card?

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/08/keir-starmer-cleared-durham-police-breaking-lockdown-rules-beer
Gravatar

Answers

61 to 80 of 84rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Atheist. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Sure this has already said, but Starmer's lawful gathering was a one-off, the unlawful No 10 gatherings were a continual pattern of behaviour.
And the non-sequitur award of the week has to go to Fatticusinch for the post at 6.31pm.

Well done. I doff my hat.
Question Author
Naomi; 7:57
Your link shows labour people becoming Durham Police and Crime Commissioner. You suggest that this Wiki article demonstrates that there was nepotism and lies. It does no such thing.
I'll look for your other explanations, and comment.
You do that, atheist.
Deskdiary
//And the non-sequitur award of the week has to go to Fatticusinch for the post at 6.31pm.

Well done. I doff my hat.//

You’re welcome. Careful your brain doesn’t fall out as you doff the hat though, it must rattle like a marble in a biscuit tin up there.
As i have said Starmer didnt make the rules,Johnson and Sturgeon did,and both of them broke their own rules.Johnson and Sturgeon both knew the rules and laws that they wrote up.Johnson has resigned.The clock is ticking on Sturgeon.
Question Author
Naomi; 14:17
"Gromit, of course the police said there was no case to answer. The boss is a staunch Labourite.... that's why Starmer could confidently say he'd resign IF a penalty was issued. He knew damn well he was safe."
and
"His mate, the Crime & Police Commissioner's certainly a person with power - and she is certainly his friend."
Your comments seem to show that you simply cannot accept that SKS did nothing wrong, but all you can say in supprt is that you think people lied about it for political reasons. You are entitled to your beliefs, but they are only beliefs and could get you into trouble if you made such comments in court.
Question Author
Naomi; 17:37
" What’s that they say about never finding a straight lawyer?"

Hardly worth pointing to this comment, but I'm scraping the barrel looking for stuff that is not simply insult aimed at your AB opponents.
Question Author
Naomi:
Errrrr. I can't find any more explanations of how you formed your views.
Atheist, You can’t? Perhaps your not looking properly - or perhaps you don’t want to.

In connection with this JNO (possibly on a different thread) mentioned that Starmer is a lawyer - and therefore he would know the law.
Incidentally, atheist, you asked the question. I’ve answered it. That my answer doesn’t suit you is, frankly, tough.
naomi24
//Atheist, You can’t? Perhaps your not looking properly - or perhaps you don’t want to.

In connection with this JNO (possibly on a different thread) mentioned that Starmer is a lawyer - and therefore he would know the law.//

……as you would reasonably expect of the Prime Minister who implemented said laws, no?
Keep going, you’ve reached rock bottom and are now starting to dig. Lol!
FattichusInch at 6.53.

Ooor, get her.

There’s somebody who’s rattled.
Lol, the one who’s rattled is your fanatical pal who can’t accept what’s happened.
You’ll both get over it eventually……we hope.
Question Author
Naomi, I asked whether or not right wing ABers woud accept the finding of Starmer and Rayner as being innocent, or would they play the MSM conspiracy card. You've answered that question insofar as it affects you. Thank you.
Naomi, when asked for evidence of incompetence or corruption, you've replied "I've said what I think", i.e. your belief or opinion, based on nothing, and completely the opposite to what the police found, based on evidence.

It's classic ... unable to accept a truth that doesn't conform to your worldview, you invent your own truth. Donald, and Boris, would be impressed.

Incidentally the UK police are not known for their left-leaning tendencies, and so how a supposedly corrupt PCC would persuade all of them to corrupt themselves too in favour of the leader of the Labour Party ... it's just fantasy stuff ... make-believe ...
Atheist, I have no idea what an MSM conspiracy card is - but you’re welcome to my answer.
Question Author
Naomi.
MSM = mainstream media
conspiracy card is a bit like race card, which you might not have heard of. I'm sure you can guess what it means.
Oh right. Thanks.
Everybody from all sides knew they were going to be cleared months ago because we all knew Durham police were not going to issue any retrospective FPNs. I am fine they got off, what I don't understand is why their drink and curry with staff was a legitimate work event when almost identical behaviour at No 10 was not and was even more heinous because people weren't allowed to see dying relatives. Totally irrelevant but a great guilt ball.

61 to 80 of 84rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Starmer And Rayner Cleared. Will This Be Accepted By Right Wing Abers?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.