ChatterBank21 mins ago
A 22 Year Old Man Arrested On Suspicion Of Murder.
I guess the cc camera images helped identify him.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
schippiegalette
//You can be arrested without being charged of a crime. Only when the Police think they have a good chance of a case are you then charged.//
Not quite, they generally confer with the CPS first to ascertain whether certain thresholds are Met and the CPS will advise what to charge the suspect with.
In the majority of cases, the police can detain someone without charge for 24 hours, but this can be extended to 36 or 96 hours if they're suspected of a serious crime. Once a police investigation has been completed, including interviews, the police have to decide whether to charge or release the suspect.
//You can be arrested without being charged of a crime. Only when the Police think they have a good chance of a case are you then charged.//
Not quite, they generally confer with the CPS first to ascertain whether certain thresholds are Met and the CPS will advise what to charge the suspect with.
In the majority of cases, the police can detain someone without charge for 24 hours, but this can be extended to 36 or 96 hours if they're suspected of a serious crime. Once a police investigation has been completed, including interviews, the police have to decide whether to charge or release the suspect.
One line of inquiry being pursued by police centres on claims that the attacker believed he was owed money for work arranged by Ms Savicke, who runs a recruitment agency, embroidery business and cleaning contractor.
I'd thought the motive might have been mental illness. If there's anything in this he must be the stupidest piece of dirt the Boston police have ever arrested.
I'd thought the motive might have been mental illness. If there's anything in this he must be the stupidest piece of dirt the Boston police have ever arrested.
// I suspect strictly speaking he’s a suspect until he’s convicted…. but I don’t know.//
chrissakes he is a convict when he is convicted
if he is charged and going forward to a jury trial - he is indicted ( nowadays ) and that is rhymes with 'despite' and not convict
you can suspect someone for any reason that is not fanciful
( and in finance for example that means he has to be reported)
chrissakes he is a convict when he is convicted
if he is charged and going forward to a jury trial - he is indicted ( nowadays ) and that is rhymes with 'despite' and not convict
you can suspect someone for any reason that is not fanciful
( and in finance for example that means he has to be reported)
-- answer removed --
another dead one - this time Reading
https:/
suspicion -anything non fanciful
and whilst I am at it - At the Lawrence inquiry there were gasps of disbelief when the investigating detective (of 20 y) said the criterion was reasonable cause ( far far higher) . - and that was why he had not arrested the lads ( and gave them the chance to dispose of evidence)
I am sorry - have I missed anything good?
https:/
suspicion -anything non fanciful
and whilst I am at it - At the Lawrence inquiry there were gasps of disbelief when the investigating detective (of 20 y) said the criterion was reasonable cause ( far far higher) . - and that was why he had not arrested the lads ( and gave them the chance to dispose of evidence)
I am sorry - have I missed anything good?
// Don't be shy - do tell us what identifying features define a druggie.//
thin face, unkept appearance
pin point pupils ( memo to self - run a mile from such people)
dilated pupils ( memo to self - run a mile from such people)
or normal pupils
needle marks in elbows ( or groin, but do not insist on looking there)
carrying suyringe
thin face, unkept appearance
pin point pupils ( memo to self - run a mile from such people)
dilated pupils ( memo to self - run a mile from such people)
or normal pupils
needle marks in elbows ( or groin, but do not insist on looking there)
carrying suyringe
//Fatticus best read my whole post " Only when the CPS decide there is a Case are you prosecuted,"
Ta Dah!//
Yes, but you said initially:
//...Police think they have a good chance of a case are you then charged.//
That’s not correct. In all cases which must go to the Crown Court (called “indictable only” offences, which obviously includes murder) it is the CPS who decide whether charges can be brought. They have to operate a two part test. The first part is that they must be sure that there is sufficient evidence to support a realistic chance of a conviction. Only if that is passed do they proceed to the second part, which is to assess whether a prosecution is “in the public interest”. Only when the CPS have authorised charges will the suspect be charged. Prosecution follows (as night follows day) and no further police/CPS authorisation is needed.
//For ‘absolute’ offences like Driving Whilst Impaired Through Drugs or Alcohol there is no need to consult the CPS, there is nothing to dispute, hence my clarification.//
That’s also not quite correct either. With one or two exceptions (principally to do with domestic violence allegations where the alleged victim will not support a prosecution) , the police can authorise charges for any “Summary” offence. These are offences which can only be dealt with in the Magistrates’ Court (which include drink and drug driving). However, the police will very often involve the CPS when excess drug or alcohol offences are being considered. Such offences are certainly not “absolute” as you describe and there are often grounds for dispute. In fact they are one of the most challenged of all driving offences. The procedures the police need to go through are complex and often form the basis of challenge. Many defendants go to trial for these offences on a number of different grounds. Whilst strictly speaking the CPS are not required to authorise such charges, they will often be involved in the charging decision where the suspect makes it known he may not plead guilty. To give you an idea of how complex the issues may be, here’s the CPS charging guidelines for such offences:
https:/
Ta Dah!//
Yes, but you said initially:
//...Police think they have a good chance of a case are you then charged.//
That’s not correct. In all cases which must go to the Crown Court (called “indictable only” offences, which obviously includes murder) it is the CPS who decide whether charges can be brought. They have to operate a two part test. The first part is that they must be sure that there is sufficient evidence to support a realistic chance of a conviction. Only if that is passed do they proceed to the second part, which is to assess whether a prosecution is “in the public interest”. Only when the CPS have authorised charges will the suspect be charged. Prosecution follows (as night follows day) and no further police/CPS authorisation is needed.
//For ‘absolute’ offences like Driving Whilst Impaired Through Drugs or Alcohol there is no need to consult the CPS, there is nothing to dispute, hence my clarification.//
That’s also not quite correct either. With one or two exceptions (principally to do with domestic violence allegations where the alleged victim will not support a prosecution) , the police can authorise charges for any “Summary” offence. These are offences which can only be dealt with in the Magistrates’ Court (which include drink and drug driving). However, the police will very often involve the CPS when excess drug or alcohol offences are being considered. Such offences are certainly not “absolute” as you describe and there are often grounds for dispute. In fact they are one of the most challenged of all driving offences. The procedures the police need to go through are complex and often form the basis of challenge. Many defendants go to trial for these offences on a number of different grounds. Whilst strictly speaking the CPS are not required to authorise such charges, they will often be involved in the charging decision where the suspect makes it known he may not plead guilty. To give you an idea of how complex the issues may be, here’s the CPS charging guidelines for such offences:
https:/
Latest Posts
Quizzes & Puzzles24 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles34 mins ago
Crosswords39 mins ago
ChatterBank93 mins ago
ChatterBank100 mins ago
