Crosswords2 mins ago
Letters Of No Confidence In Truss Being Submitted
81 Answers
Oh dear!
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/l abour-p arty-co nferenc e-live- battle- lines-d rawn-wi th-mini -budget -frontb encher- says-la bour-sh ouldnt- reverse -basic- rate-in come-ta x-cut-1 2593360
From the link:
/Liz is 'f*****' - former minister claims letters of no confidence already being submitted against the PM
The disquiet with Conservative MPs over the mini-budget is growing.
One Tory MP who served as a minister under Boris Johnson has told Sky News: "Liz is f*****."
"She is taking on markets and the Bank of England.
"Her, Kwasi, Philp and Simon [McGee] are playing A-level economics with people's lives. You cannot have monetary policy and fiscal policy at loggerheads. Something has to give."
The source also claimed moves to trigger a vote of no confidence in Ms Truss's leadership were already underway:
"They are already putting letters in as think she will crash the economy. The tax cuts don’t matter as all noise anyway - mainly reversing back to the status quo this year./
Not my asterisks, from the actual link itself.
GE on the way shortly?
https:/
From the link:
/Liz is 'f*****' - former minister claims letters of no confidence already being submitted against the PM
The disquiet with Conservative MPs over the mini-budget is growing.
One Tory MP who served as a minister under Boris Johnson has told Sky News: "Liz is f*****."
"She is taking on markets and the Bank of England.
"Her, Kwasi, Philp and Simon [McGee] are playing A-level economics with people's lives. You cannot have monetary policy and fiscal policy at loggerheads. Something has to give."
The source also claimed moves to trigger a vote of no confidence in Ms Truss's leadership were already underway:
"They are already putting letters in as think she will crash the economy. The tax cuts don’t matter as all noise anyway - mainly reversing back to the status quo this year./
Not my asterisks, from the actual link itself.
GE on the way shortly?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by FatticusInch. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.(Sigh)
Shall we do the usual dance?
https:/ /www.po liticsh ome.com /news/a rticle/ barones s-warsi -blasts -revolv ing-doo r-racis m-in-to ries-as -15-sus pended- council lors-al lowed-b ack-in
https:/ /amp.th eguardi an.com/ politic s/2022/ jun/01/ walsall -mayor- rose-ma rtin-su spended -tory-p arty-ra cist-wh atsapp- post
https:/ /mancun ion.com /2021/1 1/29/th ey-all- look-th e-same- to-me-r acism-i n-the-t ory-par ty/
Shall we do the usual dance?
https:/
https:/
https:/
I don't believe the story either, or at least, if it's true, then clearly some Tory MPs have no shame and no patience. I don't have any interest in pretending to be a fan of Liz Truss, nor her Chancellor's recent "mini" (understatement) budget. Still, a weekend hardly seems long enough to evaluate it.
But, in response to Untitled's question:
// what would be the point in sending no confidence letters? if the tory party had a new leadership election tomorrow or next month then what makes anybody think there would be a different result?
the MPs chose to let [Truss] through to the final and the party membership chose her... what reason is there to think they would choose differently? //
Assuming Truss lost a vote of no confidence, she'd be barred from standing in the subsequent leadership contest -- so the result would be necessarily different. On the other hand, I'm fairly sure there's no bar to former leaders from standing a second time in the next-but-one leadership contest, so for example Johnson may decide to try again.
But that's all hypothetical. I personally can't imagine anything more guaranteed to destroy the Tories' credibility than a second self-indulgent leadership contest in a calendar year.
But, in response to Untitled's question:
// what would be the point in sending no confidence letters? if the tory party had a new leadership election tomorrow or next month then what makes anybody think there would be a different result?
the MPs chose to let [Truss] through to the final and the party membership chose her... what reason is there to think they would choose differently? //
Assuming Truss lost a vote of no confidence, she'd be barred from standing in the subsequent leadership contest -- so the result would be necessarily different. On the other hand, I'm fairly sure there's no bar to former leaders from standing a second time in the next-but-one leadership contest, so for example Johnson may decide to try again.
But that's all hypothetical. I personally can't imagine anything more guaranteed to destroy the Tories' credibility than a second self-indulgent leadership contest in a calendar year.
Yes, fatti, but you claimed that ‘those’ making the final choice (‘those’ being politicians) weren’t ‘overly keen on seeing ethnic minorities getting the actual top job’. I challenged that and, as evidence you cited Hope not Hate to support your argument.
You’re now saying that the HNH poll does not support your argument because it was about Conservative party members, not MPs.
You seem more than a little tangled in a web of your own ignorance, or at least confusion.
You’re now saying that the HNH poll does not support your argument because it was about Conservative party members, not MPs.
You seem more than a little tangled in a web of your own ignorance, or at least confusion.
The Politics Home link is from 2019 and there is a piece on the Hope not Hate site from 2020 about a poll of Tory Party members' attitudes here
https:/ /hopeno thate.o rg.uk/2 020/09/ 30/the- cultura l-probl em-of-i slamoph obia-in -the-co nservat ive-par ty/
https:/
Exactly, TCL, that poll is about Conservative party members, not MPs and as such does not support Fatti’s assertion that those MPs weren’t ‘overly keen on seeing ethnic minorities getting the actual top job’.
He just makes things up as he goes along and expects people to believe him.
Fatti - you seem to think (in your usual non-sequitur way) that this means I support the Conservative party. It doesn’t. It just means I love pointing out when you’re talking utter crap.
He just makes things up as he goes along and expects people to believe him.
Fatti - you seem to think (in your usual non-sequitur way) that this means I support the Conservative party. It doesn’t. It just means I love pointing out when you’re talking utter crap.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.