Quizzes & Puzzles9 mins ago
Palace Racism
Ngozi Fulani was asked where she was originally from mmm, whats the problem there
it's not what or was considered a british christian name, i assume the palace get people from around the globe visiting, so why the big hoo haa.
https:/
it's not what or was considered a british christian name, i assume the palace get people from around the globe visiting, so why the big hoo haa.
https:/
Answers
I think that the lady was asking where her family originated from. I think that is a genuine question, maybe not the time nor the place but it is hardly a major issue.
17:51 Wed 30th Nov 2022
We don't really know how the conversation went as we only Ms Headley's version and what credence can we put on that?
LiW may have resigned because she thought at her age 'I don't have to put up with this' and also she knew that LiWs were being disbanded. We don't know her reasons and until we do I don't think we should witch-hunt. The other person in this case has already shown herself to be less than honourable in all senses and we are expected to believe what she says. Enough said.
LiW may have resigned because she thought at her age 'I don't have to put up with this' and also she knew that LiWs were being disbanded. We don't know her reasons and until we do I don't think we should witch-hunt. The other person in this case has already shown herself to be less than honourable in all senses and we are expected to believe what she says. Enough said.
Lady Hussey resigned because people like her don’t get into spats like this - they maintain their dignity and that of the royals - and Corby, the accuser’s word is doubted because she has previously falsely accused the royals of racism and domestic abuse. From what I’m hearing she seems to be fast losing any credibility she might have had.
naomi - // Lady Hussey resigned because people like her don’t get into spats like this - they maintain their dignity and that of the royals - and Corby, the accuser’s word is doubted because she has previously falsely accused the royals of racism and domestic abuse. From what I’m hearing she seems to be fast losing any credibility she might have had. //
Pleased to see you have recovered from your gyppy tummy.
The break away seems to have dulled your memory though - your last post to me was wailing about how I cannot have any evidence for my 'profile' of Lady Hussey, but here you are offering the reason why she resigned, with no knowledge whatsoever of whether or not your claim is in any way factual.
It does ilustrate your tireless determination to remove any hint of responsibility or blame for the incident under discussion.
Even though Lady Hussey was quite happy to assume both, by apologising and resigning
Not, as you are keen to suggest, with your that tireless and frankly baffling need to have to excuse her from wrongdoing in favour of castigating the victim in this scenario with all the fault for what happened.
Your piffle about people 'like her' not getting into 'spats like this' is utterly invented, by you, to invest in Lady Hussey a level of imagined superiority, whereby accepting responsibility for her error is simply beneath her.
Lady Hussey apologised and resigned, not because this 'spat' of which she was entirely the cause, is beneath her, but because it was the correct and moral thing to do.
Lady Hussey appears to understand what has gone on, and how to deal with it, even if you don't.
Pleased to see you have recovered from your gyppy tummy.
The break away seems to have dulled your memory though - your last post to me was wailing about how I cannot have any evidence for my 'profile' of Lady Hussey, but here you are offering the reason why she resigned, with no knowledge whatsoever of whether or not your claim is in any way factual.
It does ilustrate your tireless determination to remove any hint of responsibility or blame for the incident under discussion.
Even though Lady Hussey was quite happy to assume both, by apologising and resigning
Not, as you are keen to suggest, with your that tireless and frankly baffling need to have to excuse her from wrongdoing in favour of castigating the victim in this scenario with all the fault for what happened.
Your piffle about people 'like her' not getting into 'spats like this' is utterly invented, by you, to invest in Lady Hussey a level of imagined superiority, whereby accepting responsibility for her error is simply beneath her.
Lady Hussey apologised and resigned, not because this 'spat' of which she was entirely the cause, is beneath her, but because it was the correct and moral thing to do.
Lady Hussey appears to understand what has gone on, and how to deal with it, even if you don't.
Lady-janine - // We don't really know how the conversation went as we only Ms Headley's version and what credence can we put on that? //
I can put all the credence needed, because unlike some on here, I am not willing to descend into the frankly barmy conspiracy theories that she went to this event with the express purpose of causing trouble.
LiW may have resigned because she thought at her age 'I don't have to put up with this' and also she knew that LiWs were being disbanded. We don't know her reasons and until we do I don't think we should witch-hunt. //
I entirely agree - but that has not stopped a sustained and increasingly bizarre witch hunt on this thread against the victim in this awful scenario.
If we are not going to 'witch hunt' one, and quite right, we should not, then why are some so busy digging dirt to witch hunt the other?
// The other person in this case has already shown herself to be less than honourable in all senses and we are expected to believe what she says. Enough said. //
What ever 'dishnourable' aspects keen detractors may have dug up, it does not make me minded to disbelieve her version of events.
Had Lady Hussey found issue with them, I am sure she would have spoken up in her own defence, leaving aside naomi's amusing 'Court Circular' assessment that people of breeding don't lower themselves got get involved in 'spats'
Lady Hussey is happy to accept her responsibility, which she accepted by offering her apologies and resignation.
Despite the cabal of AB'ers on here straining every sinew to try and prove otherwise, it really actually is as simple as that.
I can put all the credence needed, because unlike some on here, I am not willing to descend into the frankly barmy conspiracy theories that she went to this event with the express purpose of causing trouble.
LiW may have resigned because she thought at her age 'I don't have to put up with this' and also she knew that LiWs were being disbanded. We don't know her reasons and until we do I don't think we should witch-hunt. //
I entirely agree - but that has not stopped a sustained and increasingly bizarre witch hunt on this thread against the victim in this awful scenario.
If we are not going to 'witch hunt' one, and quite right, we should not, then why are some so busy digging dirt to witch hunt the other?
// The other person in this case has already shown herself to be less than honourable in all senses and we are expected to believe what she says. Enough said. //
What ever 'dishnourable' aspects keen detractors may have dug up, it does not make me minded to disbelieve her version of events.
Had Lady Hussey found issue with them, I am sure she would have spoken up in her own defence, leaving aside naomi's amusing 'Court Circular' assessment that people of breeding don't lower themselves got get involved in 'spats'
Lady Hussey is happy to accept her responsibility, which she accepted by offering her apologies and resignation.
Despite the cabal of AB'ers on here straining every sinew to try and prove otherwise, it really actually is as simple as that.
roy - // You know she persistently asked 'Where are you really from?' then do you, andy? //
To return to your post - No I don't know that, which is probably why I have never suggested it, and you have made that up.
The quote advised was, "Where are you from ... no, where are you really from ..."
I have never suggested that it was said 'persistently, or even more than once.
By all means argue the points, but they need to be based on what was reported, not what you have imagined, and then cricitised me for saying.
To return to your post - No I don't know that, which is probably why I have never suggested it, and you have made that up.
The quote advised was, "Where are you from ... no, where are you really from ..."
I have never suggested that it was said 'persistently, or even more than once.
By all means argue the points, but they need to be based on what was reported, not what you have imagined, and then cricitised me for saying.
'I have never suggested that it was said 'persistently, or even more than once.'
What you have said is:
23:04 Wed 30th Nov 2022 - 'She asked a rude question, and became successively more offensive when not receiving an answer'
10:15 Thu 01st Dec 2022- 'It's not rude to ask, but when answered, and then to carry on and on because you don't like the answer you received'
10:30 Thu 01st Dec 2022 - 'Pressing for a response you think you should have, and being offensive when you don't get it goes beyond polite conversation'
08:35 Fri 02nd Dec 2022 - 'The issue arose when she refused to accept the guest's first response to the question about her origin [ ] Further questions - Where are you really from? Where are 'your people' from?
Rudeness and offence.'
Another classic case of you not recalling what you've actually written.
What you have said is:
23:04 Wed 30th Nov 2022 - 'She asked a rude question, and became successively more offensive when not receiving an answer'
10:15 Thu 01st Dec 2022- 'It's not rude to ask, but when answered, and then to carry on and on because you don't like the answer you received'
10:30 Thu 01st Dec 2022 - 'Pressing for a response you think you should have, and being offensive when you don't get it goes beyond polite conversation'
08:35 Fri 02nd Dec 2022 - 'The issue arose when she refused to accept the guest's first response to the question about her origin [ ] Further questions - Where are you really from? Where are 'your people' from?
Rudeness and offence.'
Another classic case of you not recalling what you've actually written.
Zacs - // 'I have never suggested that it was said 'persistently, or even more than once.'
What you have said is:
23:04 Wed 30th Nov 2022 - 'She asked a rude question, and became successively more offensive when not receiving an answer'
10:15 Thu 01st Dec 2022- 'It's not rude to ask, but when answered, and then to carry on and on because you don't like the answer you received'
10:30 Thu 01st Dec 2022 - 'Pressing for a response you think you should have, and being offensive when you don't get it goes beyond polite conversation'
08:35 Fri 02nd Dec 2022 - 'The issue arose when she refused to accept the guest's first response to the question about her origin [ ] Further questions - Where are you really from? Where are 'your people' from?
Rudeness and offence.'
Another classic case of you not recalling what you've actually written. //
I don;t always recall excactly what I've written, but thanks to your dilligent trawl through my posts, I don;t need to.
But if you recall, and it's very recent, Roy's question was -
// You know she persistently asked 'Where are you really from?' then do you, andy? //
Which is a specific question, in quotes.
None of the posts if mine you have tediously mined to try and argue with me, suggest or even imply, that said question was asked more than once.
I do believe that Lady Hussey pressed the point, but I never suggested that she repleatedly said "Where are you really from?" and my posts back up that assertion.
I will say to to what I said to Roy - by all means argue the points, but they need to be based on what was reported, not what you have imagined, and then cricitised me for saying.
If you are going to take the trouble to C & P my words to try and make me look dishonest, it would will be more helpful in future if you read over them again first.
That way you won't make a fool of yourself, as you have done today by accusing me of saying something i did not say, and then providing your own proof that I didn't.
Better luck next time.
What you have said is:
23:04 Wed 30th Nov 2022 - 'She asked a rude question, and became successively more offensive when not receiving an answer'
10:15 Thu 01st Dec 2022- 'It's not rude to ask, but when answered, and then to carry on and on because you don't like the answer you received'
10:30 Thu 01st Dec 2022 - 'Pressing for a response you think you should have, and being offensive when you don't get it goes beyond polite conversation'
08:35 Fri 02nd Dec 2022 - 'The issue arose when she refused to accept the guest's first response to the question about her origin [ ] Further questions - Where are you really from? Where are 'your people' from?
Rudeness and offence.'
Another classic case of you not recalling what you've actually written. //
I don;t always recall excactly what I've written, but thanks to your dilligent trawl through my posts, I don;t need to.
But if you recall, and it's very recent, Roy's question was -
// You know she persistently asked 'Where are you really from?' then do you, andy? //
Which is a specific question, in quotes.
None of the posts if mine you have tediously mined to try and argue with me, suggest or even imply, that said question was asked more than once.
I do believe that Lady Hussey pressed the point, but I never suggested that she repleatedly said "Where are you really from?" and my posts back up that assertion.
I will say to to what I said to Roy - by all means argue the points, but they need to be based on what was reported, not what you have imagined, and then cricitised me for saying.
If you are going to take the trouble to C & P my words to try and make me look dishonest, it would will be more helpful in future if you read over them again first.
That way you won't make a fool of yourself, as you have done today by accusing me of saying something i did not say, and then providing your own proof that I didn't.
Better luck next time.
naomi - // AH, good breeding is the reason she resigned. Your track record doesn’t improve. I can only think you enjoy making a fool of yourself. //
The only thing those three statements have in common is that they come from your over-heated imagination, there is no evidence for any of them.
You advised when you last retired with an attack of the vapours that you would rejoin when the discussion raised to a level commensurate with your lofty involvement.
So far, you are failing to contribute anything to raise it anywhere at all - so no change there.
The only thing those three statements have in common is that they come from your over-heated imagination, there is no evidence for any of them.
You advised when you last retired with an attack of the vapours that you would rejoin when the discussion raised to a level commensurate with your lofty involvement.
So far, you are failing to contribute anything to raise it anywhere at all - so no change there.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank19 mins ago
ChatterBank21 mins ago
Strands #269 “Come Fly With...
Quizzes & Puzzles22 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles23 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles32 mins ago
