'Woman' Rapes Two Women Using 'Her' Penis And Is Sent To A Woman's Jail.

[Deskdiary]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11670803/Transgender-woman-guilty-raping-two-women-man.html

Jesus wept - who agrees this is absurd?

And why the hell is the Mail referring to somebody with a penis who rapes women as 'her'?

In his most recent Netflix special, Ricky Gervais had a routine about this very scenario, which was hilarious because it was so absurd. Paraphrasing "He raped me", "you mean she raped you", "but he had a penis", "she had a penis you effing bigot". But clearly it wasn't that absurd after all!

[kuiperbelt]

/You’ve been told to pipe down, by a mod. You’re coming across as a petulant teeenager./

Nevertheless I have a conscience and I feel it my civil duty to point out what looks like bullying. You are obviously blind to it!!!

[bednobs]

it's very clear to see who clare used to be. If you cn't see who they were, what good would giving the name do - you wouldn't know them

[naomi24]

Clare, precisely. You’d soon speak up if you knew you were right…. hence the silence. I rest my case … for the time being:

[ClareTGold]

Thanks, Anne.

It would defeat the object to reveal my previous user name, but I suppose the challenge is to work out which user name out of the previous long-time users of this site who was a mod, and who had an unusual interest in transgender discussions, physics, and quizzing, it might be.

[fitdarren]

Two things:

kuiperbelt - step away from the thread if it distresses you, simple.

ClareTGold - I think the only one being patronising is you!

[ClareTGold]

Not at all, Naomi. Ask an honest question, that at least allows for the possibility that there's more to it than people not admitting that they're pretending or some such, and you'll get an honest answer. But I won't engage with questions that are deliberately posed in such a way as to ask me to admit that I'm wrong to start with.

* * * *

Just for the record, I prefer "she/her" to "they".

[ClareTGold]

// I think the only one being patronising is you! //

Sorry you'd think that, fitdarren -- especially when, as I pointed out earlier, I've been told that I'm pretending, or dishonest, or lying, or in a "most unfortunate" position, or that my philosophy is "ludicrous". I'm not sure how any of that isn't patronising.

[Zacs-Master]

Are you a Bradford City fan Clare?

[ClareTGold]

No.

[Zacs-Master]

Ah, ok. It’s just that your name could be read as claret gold which is the colour BC play in.

[anneasquith]

Compared to most other abers, is Clare somewhat younger ?

[Zacs-Master]

Huddersfield Giants maybe?

[naomi24]

Clare, Jo Rowling said that only females menstruate - and there’s no two ways about it. She’s right. Fact is, however it’s dressed up and wormed around, men simply do not possess the equipment.

[ClareTGold]

Oh, I see why you ask now ZM.

Also no. There is a cryptic link between my current username and my previous one, but it's nothing to do with colours.

[kuiperbelt]

/kuiperbelt - step away from the thread if it distresses you, simple./

But that would be like seeing someone in the gutter who is hurt and asking for help, then walking on by as if I hadn't seen anything.

It's not in my nature to do that!!!

[naomi24]

Clare, I know who you are …obviously … but the cryptic link in the name eludes me. Working on it.

[Zacs-Master]

There’s no one in distress. Your trying to be some sort of caped crusader when non is required, Kuiper.

[ClareTGold]

Have fun, Naomi! It's probably not a very good cryptic link, though.

[naomi24]

Can’t see it yet. Still thinking.

[Canary42]

This thread is nearly three weeks old and has wandered well off topic :-

Time it was closed Methinks