Shopping & Style0 min ago
Braverman.
Sunak has defended Braverman, after she asked Civil servants to help get her Special treatment
after she was booked for speeding. She asked them how to avoid points on her licence , and how to avoid attending a speed awareness course with other people. I/E (members of the public).
....After all she is a member of CPPC.,,,,, One law for them again..
after she was booked for speeding. She asked them how to avoid points on her licence , and how to avoid attending a speed awareness course with other people. I/E (members of the public).
....After all she is a member of CPPC.,,,,, One law for them again..
Answers
Just an old copper harking back to glory days, Rosie, nothing to see, move along now.
11:24 Sun 21st May 2023
From the Sunday Times,
"Suella Braverman asked civil servants to help her avoid a speeding fine and points on her licence by arranging a private one-to-one driving awareness course.
The arrangement, which the home secretary sought after being caught speeding last summer, would have meant she would not have to attend an in-person course with other motorists, or an online one where her name and face would be visible on camera to other participants.
When the civil servants refused to help, she turned to a political aide who tried to persuade the course provider to agree to the arrangements.
After the requests were refused, Braverman, 43, who is a barrister and in charge of law enforcement, pulled out and opted to take the three points on her licence."
"Suella Braverman asked civil servants to help her avoid a speeding fine and points on her licence by arranging a private one-to-one driving awareness course.
The arrangement, which the home secretary sought after being caught speeding last summer, would have meant she would not have to attend an in-person course with other motorists, or an online one where her name and face would be visible on camera to other participants.
When the civil servants refused to help, she turned to a political aide who tried to persuade the course provider to agree to the arrangements.
After the requests were refused, Braverman, 43, who is a barrister and in charge of law enforcement, pulled out and opted to take the three points on her licence."
is this the Braverman who tried to dodge a three-line whip to vote on illegal migration, in order to have a cop shop photo op?
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ politic s/2023/ may/21/ suella- braverm an-trie d-to-ge t-out-o f-final -vote-o n-small -boats- bill
https:/
//The arrangement, which the home secretary sought after being caught speeding last summer, would have meant she would not have to attend an in-person course with other motorists, or an online one where her name and face would be visible on camera to other participants.//
Not correct. The participants of a speed awareness course on a zoom meeting do not see their fellow offenders. Fact
Not correct. The participants of a speed awareness course on a zoom meeting do not see their fellow offenders. Fact
RETRO, why does guidance state, "Protecting the confidentiality of our clients is of the upmost importance, therefore you must ensure that nobody other than the course participant can view your screen. You must attend the online course in a private room with your screen facing a wall to prevent anyone other than yourself from hearing and seeing the course content."
What could be confidential other than seeing or hearing about the other folk there?
What could be confidential other than seeing or hearing about the other folk there?
Braverman has clearly abused the ministerial code of conduct and an inquiry is needed . But will she be investigated at tax payers expense .Like Boris was at a cost £245,000, then kicked into the long grass for a couple of years hoping you forget and still never know what the outcome was. This is typical Tory Politcs
It appears that one of her aides denied Braverman had been fined as recently as April.
'Mirror reporter: "So it’s completely untrue? She’s not been done for speeding, it’s completely wrong? Or it’s just the bit about the speed awareness course that is wrong?"
Braverman aide: "So what are you asking sorry?"
MR: "So she’s not been done for speeding?"
BA: "When has she been done for speeding? There’s nothing like that."
MR: "Pardon?"
BA: "When has she been done for speeding? It’s nothing like that."
MR: "There’s nothing like that?"
BA: "When has she been done for speeding?"
MR: "I don’t know the exact date."
BA: "Oh mate, this is just nonsense, honestly."
MR: "So you’re saying there’s absolutely nothing here at all?"
BA: "No."'
Telephone conversation on April 4.'
https:/ /www.mi rror.co .uk/new s/polit ics/sue lla-bra vermans -team-o riginal ly-deni ed-3003 5276
'Mirror reporter: "So it’s completely untrue? She’s not been done for speeding, it’s completely wrong? Or it’s just the bit about the speed awareness course that is wrong?"
Braverman aide: "So what are you asking sorry?"
MR: "So she’s not been done for speeding?"
BA: "When has she been done for speeding? There’s nothing like that."
MR: "Pardon?"
BA: "When has she been done for speeding? It’s nothing like that."
MR: "There’s nothing like that?"
BA: "When has she been done for speeding?"
MR: "I don’t know the exact date."
BA: "Oh mate, this is just nonsense, honestly."
MR: "So you’re saying there’s absolutely nothing here at all?"
BA: "No."'
Telephone conversation on April 4.'
https:/
The woman is an idiot.
It is clear that every stone is currently being turned to dish dirt on Tory ministers and MPs. Nothing wrong with that (provided the investigations reveal the truth and lies are not perpetrated).
All Ms Braverman had to do was to enrol for the online course, sit quietly in a corner and participate in it - job done. Nobody needed to know about it and there was no reason for her not to have dealt with it in that way. There may have been one or two "tut tuts" about her speeding but that's all.
Now she's been exposed as expecting special treatment, which she clearly did not warrant. Politicians seem capable of digging themselves huge holes when no digging was required at all.
It is clear that every stone is currently being turned to dish dirt on Tory ministers and MPs. Nothing wrong with that (provided the investigations reveal the truth and lies are not perpetrated).
All Ms Braverman had to do was to enrol for the online course, sit quietly in a corner and participate in it - job done. Nobody needed to know about it and there was no reason for her not to have dealt with it in that way. There may have been one or two "tut tuts" about her speeding but that's all.
Now she's been exposed as expecting special treatment, which she clearly did not warrant. Politicians seem capable of digging themselves huge holes when no digging was required at all.