ChatterBank1 min ago
Oh Dear, More Bad News
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Hymie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Were you not earlier advised that 'gammons' is tantamount to hate speech?
https:/ /www.gq -magazi ne.co.u k/artic le/what -does-g ammon-m ean
https:/
You’ve nothing to worry about unless you are a gammon.
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Gammo n_(insu lt)
https:/
For a person who enjoys posting his trash under the username of Hymie I'm surprised you use a Jewish favoured forename to use hate speech. Or perhaps I'm not so surprised.
//What matters is that it is the discourse of the sewer. It’s like calling a Jew a k**e or mocking African Americans for eating fried chicken. It’s like calling poor white Americans trailer trash.//
//What matters is that it is the discourse of the sewer. It’s like calling a Jew a k**e or mocking African Americans for eating fried chicken. It’s like calling poor white Americans trailer trash.//
The Wikipedia article defines a gammon as follows:-
'In 2018, it became particularly known as a term to describe either those on the political right or those who supported Brexit.'
I’m willing to bet many on the political right and Brexit supporters will not be happy that the Tories have given up on their bill of rights – nothing racist or hate speech about that.
'In 2018, it became particularly known as a term to describe either those on the political right or those who supported Brexit.'
I’m willing to bet many on the political right and Brexit supporters will not be happy that the Tories have given up on their bill of rights – nothing racist or hate speech about that.
//// Gammon is pig. And who eats pig? Not Jews and not Muslims. Christians eat pork, white and black. But gammon refers to whites only – to white Christians, then. So now white Christians have their own personal term of abuse, courtesy of the new left. Thank you. For what exactly? For making political discourse cheaper and more disgusting every day? For alienating potential allies in the battle against austerity? For making racial and religious slurs a little more acceptable, while all the time claiming to loathe them, which is, if you have no self-awareness allow me to make you aware of it, hypocrisy? For making floating voters think that socialists are screaming, useless kids who will tear down a world and forget to build another one for name-calling on Twitter? For behaving just as you say your enemies do? ////