ChatterBank1 min ago
Never Believe Anything Until It Has Been Officially Denied......
So Rodders wants us back in the EUSSR - reminds me of a Beatles song!
Answers
NAOMI, "No, [Boris Johnson] was talking about those in paid employment - in other words 'in work'.
The latest data for folk in employment or, “in work) show the ONS includes self-employed folk in its figures.
‘The number of people in employment in the UK is measured by the Labour Force Survey (LFS). The LFS adheres to international standards and definitions and, in the case of the definition of employment, these standards are those of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). For the past 40 years the ILO and the LFS have defined persons in employment as those who have completed some work in the reference week or are temporarily away from their job, such as being on holiday. The only change was in 1982 when, for operational purposes, the ILO clarified the notion of “some work” to be interpreted as “work for at least one hour”. The definition has remained the same since.’
‘The UK employment rate was estimated at 75.5% in May to July 2023, 0.5 percentage points lower than February to April 2023. ***The quarterly decrease in employment was mainly driven by full-time self-employed workers.***
The estimate of payrolled employees for August 2023 is largely unchanged on the month, down 1,000 on the revised July 2023 figure, to 30.1 million. The August 2023 estimate should be treated as a provisional estimate and is likely to be revised when more data are received next month.’ [emphasis added]
"Perhaps the Director General has always been an employee. People who aren't are not on anyone's payroll."
Perhaps the Director General knows what the ONS means by, "people in work" unlike Boris Johnson?
Corby, Boris would have been given that figure by one of his aides and since statistics are in the public domain and easily verified, it's ridiculous to suggest he lied deliberately. Furthermore, it makes no sense to include the self-employed. They're never going to be included in unemployment figures so it's no surprise 'statistics' aren’t to be trusted. This nonsense emanates from the same mean-spirited mentality that considers a piece of cake a party.
NAOMI, "Furthermore, it makes no sense to include the self-employed. They're never going to be included in unemployment figures"
Self-employed folk who are unemployed are included in unemployment figures.
“3.Flows in and out of self-employment
The biggest movement out of self-employment during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic was driven by flows into employee status
Here we look at changes in people flowing into self-employment and out of self-employment to other labour market statuses: employees, ***unemployed*** and economically inactive.”[emphasis added]
//Self-employed folk who are unemployed are included in unemployment figures.//
No.
//The biggest movement out of self-employment during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic was driven by flows into employee status//
People who move out of self-employment into employee status are no longer self-employed.
Boris Johnson was speaking about folk in work which includes those who are on a payroll and the self-employed but the figures he quoted related only to those on a payroll.
The unemployment figures include those who were employed and those who are classed as self-employed and available for work but not working.
Self-employed folk keep that status until they change it with HMRC.
A self-employed person is classed as self-employed until a change is notified to HMRC.
The ONS defines unemployed folk as those who are,
"•without a job, have been actively seeking work in the past four weeks and are available to start work in the next two weeks
•out of work, have found a job and are waiting to start it in the next two weeks"
That shows a self-employed person without a job but available and looking for one can be unemployed.