Donate SIGN UP

'Tommy Robinson' And 'Friends' Make A Nuiscance Of Themselves, So No Change There.

Avatar Image
andy-hughes | 17:27 Sat 11th Nov 2023 | News
322 Answers

Tommy Robinson leads supporters through London | Watch (msn.com)

 

Gravatar

Answers

161 to 180 of 322rss feed

First Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by andy-hughes. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

So which other 'public figures' do you 'attack', Andy?  Or is it just Tommy? 

> Interesting why someone who attacks complete strangers by their own admission would 'despise' a person for their political views.  How sad.

That's what most people do, to some extent. For example, what do you think of Jeremy Corbyn?  And how do you know him, to make that judgement? 

 

This tells you what Corbyn is and always has beed.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1724174270438257142

Interesting Corbyn, the terrorists friend, should be mentioned. But think the post was meant to be about Tommy Robinson, and wow, interesting that standing up for Britain elicits such bigotry from the left.

Khandro, this from Wikipedia

//Robinson has a long-standing criminal record. His convictions include for violence, stalking, financial and immigration frauds, drug possession and public order offences//

If you want to know more I suggest you 'do your own research'. Pmsl.

So, Roy, what do you think of Jeremy Corbyn?  And how do you know him, to make that judgement? 

Let me guess ...

You despise him.

And you base that on what you've seen in the media.

Just like Andy Hughes talking about Tommy Robinson ...

Spungle

So which other 'public figures' do you 'attack', Andy?  Or is it just Tommy? 

__________________

 

 

He attacks Gloria Hunniford and Tommy Robinson with equal measure.

Question Author

Roy  - No, I don't. 

Andy-Hughes, back to separating the art from the artist, I find it quite irrational that you are quite happy to separate the work of a filthy paedophile from his crimes but not the politics of someone who has the best interest of this country at heart from his, which when compared to the child abuser's pale into relative insignificance.  

Question Author

Spungle at 22.36 - I attack whoever irks me at the time - just like the majority of posters on here do.

Question Author

Naomi - I fail to see any 'art' in what 'Tommy Robinson' does, I am discounting the art of deception.

Comparing the two is a stretch even for you, and obviously it does not require a response, which would render a dignity it does not merit, so you'll have to do better than that.

Too difficult for you, Andy-Hughes, not to mention rather embarrassing.  Thought it might be.

Question Author

Naomi - Please don't flatter yourself. It will be a cold day in he'll when you can offer an argument that I find 'too difficult' 

How very droll you are.

Oh really?  It'll continue to await your response then.  I'll look on again tomorrow.

Tommy was paid by the isrealis to take attention of the ceasefire march. It worked. His idiot following have no clue they were used

^ 🙄

Question Author

Naomi - Don't waste your time on my account, I am not entertaining your illogical and bizarre connections, it might encourage you, and that would never do.

can the mods stop spitting and hissing at each other please - I plead as a frequent victim of the delete button - It is tiresome to have to wade thro the endless mod contributions t get to the real  meat of RoyfromOz - hi Woy ! - or Gulliver.

Just reading it makes me want to go to bed....

Question Author

Peter - We are posting as AB'ers, not as Mods.

Sleep well. 😴 

> Andy-Hughes, back to separating the art from the artist, I find it quite irrational that you are quite happy to separate the work of a filthy paedophile from his crimes but not the politics of someone who has the best interest of this country at heart from his, which when compared to the child abuser's pale into relative insignificance.

I also don't agree with Andy Hughes separating the art from the artist, and I don't agree with you, Naomi, separating a political leader from their crimes. If a leader is problematic then get a better leader.  

If my politics tended towards the far right, and I was law-abiding and wanted to follow a leader who was also law-abiding, a leader without a long criminal history - who should I be following?

161 to 180 of 322rss feed

First Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

'Tommy Robinson' And 'Friends' Make A Nuiscance Of Themselves, So No Change There.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.