Donate SIGN UP

'Tommy Robinson' And 'Friends' Make A Nuiscance Of Themselves, So No Change There.

Avatar Image
andy-hughes | 16:27 Sat 11th Nov 2023 | News
322 Answers

Tommy Robinson leads supporters through London | Watch (msn.com)

 

Gravatar

Answers

221 to 240 of 322rss feed

First Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by andy-hughes. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

I don't think that lying is a crime (usually).

 

is lying now a crime?

Put me in prison, i told my 11yo this morning there were no chocolate bars left.  But there are, i just want to eat it myself

Khandro's got himself in a bit of a muddle. In fact the while post has become odd. There are some posters who seem to be defending Robinson without actually admitting what they are doing; they seem to hate Islam so much that they find Robinson almost reasonable.

 

Khandro, I don't understand where you're going with this.

depends if you are lying under oath

this can be very bad - lying in a witness statement is actionable ( you have to go to  bed early)

naomi: Where I'm 'going' is addressing the assertions above, that the only aspect worthy of consideration about T.R. is his 'criminality'.

I challenge them to watch the interview with him I've posted above, but of course they wont because it might interfere with their predjudices. 

> I don't understand where you're going with this.

I think it's called "down a rabbithole".

> Ellipsis; I didn't ask if you had a criminal record, I asked if you have never committed a crime. 

> So you've never been fined for speeding. Never taken anything which wasn't technically yours to take or trespassed. Never lied?

No, never. 😉 But let's suppose that I had, or Rishi Sunak had, or Keir Starmer, or Suella Braverman, or Richard Tice - people that are or were political leaders of some description - is that in some way comparable to a political leader with a long criminal record, including convictions for violence, stalking, financial and immigration frauds, drug possession and public order offences? No.  I could agree with his politics - as it happens, I don't - but I could never agree with him and his methods, and therefore, even if I did agree with his politics, I'd be agreeing with somebody else - not him.

"amongst all those pro-Palestine marchers, thousands of whom are Muslims, have you ever seen a poster or a placard calling for Hamas - who let's not forget started this war by slaughtering over 1000 Jews in cold blood - to lay down their arms?"


yes! peter tatchell was there saying that. do you know how i know? i saw him with my own eyes and nor was he alone.

@15.33.Best answer,A-H?Yes,Untitled,there are some on here who dont realise it was the Hamas terrorists who started this ***-sh*w.The Hamas started this latest bit of blood-letting.If a ceasefire happens,it has to be on Israels terms only.

Question Author

Khandro - //

naomi: Where I'm 'going' is addressing the assertions above, that the only aspect worthy of consideration about T.R. is his 'criminality'. //

His criminality is absolutely central to his persona as a do-gooding crusader for the rights of people, when he is actually nothing more than a serious criminal lining his pockets as a by-product of his self-righteous ego-tripping.

// I challenge them to watch the interview with him I've posted above, but of course they wont because it might interfere with their predjudices. //

I have watched it.

And it simply underlines what anyone with even a passing knowledge of 'Tommy Robinson' already knows - he has placed his wife and family in danger by his relentless attention-seeking and self-righteous posturing.

What shines through is his planet-sized ego, the aqrrogance of assuming that 'defending' this country falls to him and his band of football hooligan scum followers.

And why, i wonder, does he still, after all this time, masquerade under the adopted name of a football hooligan?

Most people who want to make a difference do not pretend to be someone else, especially not a hooligan yob.

Why doesn't 'Tommy' use his own name? Does he fear that his double-barrelled moniker will alienate his hoodlum friends?

The man is a joke, a pompous nasty racist joke.

And as for adding the comment that he is 'the bravest man in Britain' - that has got to be a joke, and an offensive one at that.

It offends any and all of the service personel and police fire and ambulance services who have to attend and deal with the fall-out from his rabble rousing nonsense.

He is no more 'brave' than any idiot with a big mouth and a gang behind him - he is the worse level of coward, nothing less.

Ellipsis, khandro isn't down a rabbit hole.

 

Untitled,  You saw  Peter Tatchell?  Were you there?  Odd because he said that both sides should lay down their arms not just one and I suspect that interview is what you watched.   I asked if you saw any banners or posters demanding that Hamas lay down arms.  Somehow I don't think you did.  

He was there holding a placard calling for an armistice and an end to the hamas dictatorship yes. 

Andy Hughes - you watched a video on Tommy Robinson that is over an hour long?  Course you did.  You've offered nothing substantial or relevant whatsoever as an argument here - not a word about what he said on that video.   Simply yet another of your trademark ranting character assassinations.

That's not the same thing at all, untitled.  I'll ask again.  We're you there?

"said that both sides should lay down their arms not just one "


you didn't ask about a placard specifying just one naomi... both sides laying down arms would include hamas doing so wouldn't it

yes

Ok.  An eye witness - and no placards demanding Hamas lay down their arms.  Just Israel.

both sides naomi. both. both of them. both israel and hamas. both. inclusive of hamas. it would be a bit silly to demand only one side stop wouldn't it.

Funny how the lefty types get all frothy at the mouth over one football yobbo yet can't bring themselves to condemn the religion that wants us all dead.

Those marches are in support of Palestine.  That's why they're awash with Palestinian flags and colours.  

221 to 240 of 322rss feed

First Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

'Tommy Robinson' And 'Friends' Make A Nuiscance Of Themselves, So No Change There.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.