Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Yet Another Brexit Benefit; With Many Food Stuffs Having To Be Labelled ‘Not For Eu’
Ha ha ha.
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by Hymie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Everybody does understand ,your beloved eureich standards mean just about squat to most people...its you that doesnt understand that nobody cares about your obsessional rants about the eureich....go there, leave us alone we'll get on just fine without you..and you know what you can do with your eureich standards..
You ask why. Probably because gutless politicians fail to trigger a rethink on our ridiculous Irish Sea internal border, which presently causes problems. That isn't about Brexit as some like to claim, it is about stupid post Brexit agreements with a federal block that are incapable, or who refuse to, solve their own border issues while keeping to the Befast Agreement. All the more evidence as to why any self respecting nation should avoid bring part of that group.
“Once UK citizens start seeing domestic foodstuffs labelled ‘Not for EU’, many will think that it does not meet minimum EU standards, and is of inferior quality..”
Those of them blessed with just a little more sense than they were born with will think nothing of the sort. They will understand that it is the result of the EU being fearful that their precious “Single Market” is being invaded by contraband goods and they are incapable of devising methods to prevent such an invasion other than insisting the labelling of goods to that effect. As explained by Togo, there is a black market springing up in Ireland and this labelling will put a stop to it. After all, who in their right mind would buy food with “Not for EU” printed in eight point font on the pack. Especially when it is produced in the same place, from the same ingredients and by the same methods as the same stuff without such labelling. Of course EU customers are quite happy to trust the quality of foodstuffs produced in such havens of good husbandry and hygiene such as Greece, Romania and Bulgaria and I’m quite sure they are likely to believe that the UK is a cesspit of disease and germs. The reason no other country has to produce such ridiculous labelling is that no other country has an open border with a bureaucratic idiocy and it is a feature which the EU simply can neither cope with nor comprehend.
Of course these Irish border issues, which seem to worry nobody in either the UK or Ireland, are being addressed in order to satisfy the EU. An open Irish border was seen as totally incompatible with the EU’s Single Market, but it seems that a message in small print on foodstuff labels, which is unlikely to be noticed by anybody, least of all cause them any concern, satisfies the regulation-hungry Euro bureaucrats.
Quite simple --it's to do with the agreement between the EU and the UK called the Windsor framework. If certain foods are labelled not for the EU then it makes trade easier between us and NI and the EU. Instead of all the red tape and form filling there will be two lane traffic.One for goods to NI the other labelled 'not for EU' meaning those goods can not be forwarded onto the EU. Sorry I can't be more explicit.
"Sorry I can't be more explicit."
I think you've been very explicit.
But it has to be said that it wouldn't matter too much whether you have or you haven't. The OP is almost certainly aware of the reason for this labelling. However, as can be gathered from both the title of the thread and his input to it, he has chosen to make a massive mountain out of a tiny molehill. This is largely because he cannot accept that the UK has chosen a different path which does not involved membership of the EU and takes every opportunity to highlight the changes in our processes and procedures which are required to travel that path. These all contribute to his claim that Brexit has been an "absolute disaster" (or similar descriptions of catstrophe). Which, of course, is utter nonsense.
Some of the things he highlights have some merit, which is expected because unravelling 50 years of legal entanglement is bound to raise some problems. But many - such as this - simply emphasise his apparent need to clutch at straws.
Once UK citizens start seeing domestic foodstuffs labelled ‘Not for EU’, many will think that it does not meet minimum EU standards, and is of inferior quality..”
Those of them blessed with just a little more sense than they were born with will think nothing of the sort.
No exactly !
Many being rabid anti EU will thinkthe exact opposite
that it is so labelled because it is HIGHER quality than the EU crap
You read it first on AB
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.