And Even More Good News From Labour.
News11 mins ago
https:/
If the money is so She ite why pick that career? get a job you like instead of holding the unwell public to ransom. Disgusting tools should be ashamed of themselves. Impose the already generous rise and fire those that don't go back.
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.TORATORATORA, "All they do is work out the hours they do and quote an hourly rate. It may be arithmetically accurate but they are salaried NOT hourly paid."
Why does the Government quote an hourly rate in their argument then?
In the BBC link, the Doctor works an average of forty-eight hour a week which equates to 2,496 in a year.
What hourly rate is that for salaries of £32,000 and £37,000 a year?
00:13 most salaries are the result of supply and demand. If you have a skill that is in demand it commands a higher salary. The quoted £32-37 is for doctors in training (who gets paid whilst in education? I didn't) they get much more when qualified. This is about politics with a side order of greed.
00:28 well I have had many years with no rise and even when I did it was noting like the 10% they've already had let alone the 35% they are trying to extort. I have never needed to strike or be in a union I have never negotiated at pay rise time, I get what they give me, sometimes nothing. I rely on my own skills and ability to get a job I like. They should try that.
TORATORATORA, "The quoted £32-37 is for doctors in training (who gets paid whilst in education? I didn't)"
Were you educated for an average of forty-eight hour a week?
Were you educated at weekends and during the night?
Are there many jobs where trainees should not expect to be paid whilst learning what to do?
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.