News0 min ago
Catherine Byaruhanga.....
Now I know that we must have ethnic diversity in news readers but how did this woman pass a screen test? She can't pronounce "L", says "De" instead of "the" and stumbles over sentences all the time, just waiting to see if she says "aks"! What happened to quality, like Clive Myrie, Trevor McDonut and Moira Stewart for example?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.TTT - // ... they know they were just pretending, like you, it's an AB thing, be contrarian at all costs., That may work against the the pipsqueak idiots but even they realise the game is up. I commend you, you stayed on, well done, //
I think you are seriously over-estimating the value of your OP, and your value in arguing it to the extent that you have.
I suspect that the other posters have realised that you are determined to maintain this ludicrous notion that they are 'fooling themselves' rather than 'admit' that you are 'right', and they have decided there is no point in carrying on.
You are determined to maintain the facade that everyone else actually agrees with you, and now they are too 'frightened' to own up.
If you think that, you are delusional.
// I like you so I'll go easy. //
Please don't hold back on my account, I can beat you to a stadstill in a logical argument on a bad day.
My worst is still streets better than your best - a quick glance - and objective reasoned glance, not your fantasy verison - will show the truth of that.
TTT - // ... err no, just an opinion, //
This thread ceased to be about 'an opinion' the moment someone disagreed with you.
Your opinion was in the OP, and fair enough, I, and others do not agree with you, which is absolutely not a problem.
The problem began when you decided, for reasons of your own, that I, and everyone else, actually do agree with you, but we are frightened to say so.
And that is the argument you have consistently come back with, no matter how many times it is refuted.
It's like arguing with a Flat Earther. The evidence against your point has been offered, you prefer to think that those offering it are in full agreement with you, but for some reason, and only you know what they may be, are unable to simply come out and say that they agree with you.
They don't.
I don't.
And I don;t mind not agreeing with you.
I simply take exception to your assertion that actually I do agree, but I'm frightened to say so.
You and I have debated long enough, sometimes agreeing, sometimes absulutely not agreeing, but you know me well enough that, whatever my faults may be, being 'frightened' to express and defend my opinion, has never been one of them!
TTT - // The bird can't talk that's my view and I am entitled to it. //
No-one has ever suggested that you should.
Only that you allow others to have the view to which they are equally entitled, without you telling them they are frightened to agree with you, when they don't.
// You and the other idiots can have their view mine is above, I am not going to change it. //
Having a different view to you does not make me an idiot, and I would expect better of you than to be offensive, simply because I do not view your OP in the same way you do.
Goodnight.
AH: "
Please don't hold back on my account, I can beat you to a stadstill in a logical argument on a bad day.
My worst is still streets better than your best - a quick glance - and objective reasoned glance, not your fantasy verison - will show the truth of that." - oh we do love ourselves don't we, bet there are a lot of mirrors in your house.
People on here love to oppose, it's more important to them than anything else. Look at my TWAU threads they have people pretending to be thick rather than go alone with a slightly TIC observation. Anyway I digress.
You are trying to bully me into agreeing with you. I don't on this and I am entitled to my view, the woman is not fit to read the news. I don't care how many disagree or agree, that is my view. History has shown on far more important matters than this that the herd is often wrong.
Mozz: "that's your view and you are indeed entitled to it. How come we're not entitled to a differing view? It seems that our views aren't based on seeing and hearing the woman, merely a desperation to disagree with you." - I respect others view but the latter half of this thread is me refuting the goading and derogatory comments. Andy likes to dismiss and disrespect. I'll shut up shortly after he does. I was happy to end this Tuesday until Andy with his customary goading and condescending style decided to start a fight; 21:35; "Looks like TTT has retired hurt - again.Best thing really."- Well I haven't and I never will.
TTT - I am not trying to 'bully' you into anything - it's not me calling you an idiot on this thread.
I have never, and would never, deny your right to an opinion, or to disagree with my opinion.
You know that - we've disagreed enough times!
My argument is your persistent argument that I, and others, who disagree with you, don't actually disagree with you, we are doing so just to be awkward.
I can only speak personally, but you know that many times I have agreed with you in the past, and will again.
If you want to offer an argument that other detractors are being awkward for the sake of it, that's between you and them.
I simply want you to extract my name from that group because you know as well as I do, that I am not part of it.
Once again this morning, you huffing assert your right to your opinion.
No-one, including me, has ever suggested that you are not entitled to your opinion.
I am simply asking that you extend that courtesy to me.
That includes not calling me an idiot because my view happens on this occasion to be the opposite of yours.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.