So South Kora Goes To The Dogs...?
News1 min ago
He Might Not Have Done It? Right Oh!
221 Answers
https:/
He was already on bail for assault and threatening to kill her! Well I'll go to the foot of our stairs. I hope the apologists are having a little iternal review.
Why was he on bail? Why wasn't the scum in the slammer? I think we know, once again someone dies because we are petrified of offending muslims. Madness.
Answers
1. A man was captured, on a variety of CCTV films, stabbing to death a woman who was pushing a baby in a pushchair.2. The suspect was named, his photograph was published but his relationship to the victim was not given.3. The suspect was shown, in footage he filmed himself, assembling a baby's crib. He was confirmed as originally hailing from Bangladesh and as...
12:55 Wed 10th Apr 2024
TTT - // AH: "The people who carried out these attrocities are not doing so because they are Muslims, they are doing so because they are deranged psychopaths, who like to use their advised beliefs as an excuse for their murderous behaviour." - finally we are getting somewhere. ... //
No, it is you who is 'finally getting somewhere'!
I have been presenting this argument on this site for decades, and you have always resisted it, and now you are in agreement!
// You accept that Hamas, ISIS, Al qaeda etc are "deranged psychopaths", that's a relief. //
Of course I do, I have never ever argued any diffrerently.
This is not me suddenly seeing the light, it is you accepting my point, at last.
// Now what about the people who lynched a woman on the say so of some pedlar who had annoyed her? They were just ordinary muslims going about their business yet they were very easily turned into a murderous mob. //
Yes - but because that's how mobs work.
They are not required to be Muslims to do that - just adopting mob mentality, which happens the world over when the circumstances create it.
Self-rigtheousness is an inherent charactaristic in a large number of people - and a mob situation brings it to the fore simultaneously with very little provocation.
TTT - // "If Islam commanded its followers to destroy all infidels, and they all obeyed, you and I would not be sitting here exchanging views today - we would be dead." - err no, they would. //
That makes no sense.
If every adult Muslim in the world set about mudering every infidel, how would they 'be dead'?
TTT - // If they started that nonsense they'd get wiped out first. //
That means that for every Muslim with the fire to murder infidels, there must be an opposite, greater number of non-Muslims who will murder them instead.
Maybe in the video game of your mind TTT - but here on planet Earth, the majority of the population don't actually like violence and don't go around killing strangers - Muslim or not.
AH: "I have been presenting this argument on this site for decades, and you have always resisted it, and now you are in agreement!" - I have never denied that most muslims are not extremists but like the Germans in WWII they permit the nutters to operate. If they put their house in order I'd have a lot more sympathy. As it stands they give the impression that they at least tacitly support their extremist counterparts.
AH: "That means that for every Muslim with the fire to murder infidels, there must be an opposite, greater number of non-Muslims who will murder them instead." - no it means that the non muslim world would quickly wake up to the threat and deal with it out of necessity not because they want to, they'd have to.
"Maybe in the video game of your mind TTT - but here on planet Earth, the majority of the population don't actually like violence and don't go around killing strangers - Muslim or not." - yes but if the world knoew that muslims were hunting them they'd very quickly react accordingly. That's human nature.
-- answer removed --
