Motoring74 mins ago
How Many Onn Here Thinkthis Is Acceptable?
Farage was splattered with milkshake today.
I'm pretty sure I know who will be so come on admit it. The left always get violent when no argument. She should be arrested, charged with assault and fined regardless of what (any) politican wants to happen.
Personally I deplore such actions against any politian and before the usual start I was right behind 2 Jabs when he was attacked - look it up if you dont believe me.
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.At the risk of sounding humourless, fiveleaves, NO I did not enjoy this. It is denigrating the electoral process and once more proving that some people simply cannot tolerate the fact that others have different opions themselves. That those people have to resort to physical aggression is deplorable in a civilised society.
Free speech must mean that - many people nowadays dare not express their opinions on anything. I hesitate quite often. Just to be clear - I was also appalled when Prescott was egged.
In defence of the position that despite being found guilty of 32 felony charges, Trump may not have actually committed the crimes based on other guilty verdicts being shown to have been wrong.
Well, maybe you can cite a case where one of the co-conspirators (Michael Cohen) pled guilty to his involvement in the criminal conspiracy and spent time in jail (when there was no criminal conspiracy).
It took the jury less than 2 days to find Trump guilty of all 32 charges – and in the jury selection process, one of the jurors admitted that they got some of their ‘news’ from Trump’s ‘Truth Social’.
“In defence of the position that despite being found guilty of 32 felony charges, Trump may not have actually committed the crimes based on other guilty verdicts being shown to have been wrong.
Etc….”
You still miss the point (and I’m beginning to think you do so deliberately). But I’ll try again.
I’ve no view on Mr Trump’s verdict. I’ve taken no interest in the case and know nothing about it. What concerns me is your assertion that people should be silenced because they say things you don’t like or don’t want to hear for one reason or another. Nobody in this country should be silenced as long as what they say does not break the law.
What makes you believe that you (or indeed anybody else) should be the arbiters of what people can or cannot say?
Much against my better judgement I put the James O’Brien clip on subtitles (I’d rather stick pins in my eyes than listen to him). Basically all he was saying is that the media are to blame for beatifying Mr Farage and the public are to blame for believing the media. Well that’s just too bad. If Mr Farage is so ridiculous all his opponents have to do is mount a better campaign and nobody will listen to him. But you want him silenced.
Sorry, but thankfully it doesn’t work like that here.
I am sure that Andrew Malkinson is delighted to be paraded as an example of criminal injustice for any convicted felon anywhere in the world. I'm sure that his original trial had just as much oversight as the former President, for example.
There's a huge difference between Malkinson and Trump. Malkinson didn't do it. Trump did it, the only question was whether it was OK to call it "Legal expenses" when saying something a bit more descriptive might have lost him the 2016 election ...
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.