Well I'm not sure really, I can see what you mean in the sence that it was visually enormous and unlike anything 'real' we had seen. But I think that the phrase 'work of art' doesn't sit well with me.
Have you ever seen the images of one of the men who jumped from the tower? There's one where it looks literally like he is diving. He is perfectly straight against the tower but upsidedown. He almost looks peaceful. (However in futher footage that is shown to be pretty far from the case).
It remains one of the most amazing photographs I have ever seen. For me it captures a lot about that day. Hope in the face of sheer hopelessness.
I suppose if you take the literal meaning of art as being an expression of self, or an experience to behold and enjoy, then there would have been a minority of people who did indeed perceive 9/11 as art.
I personally think that art is a very inappropriate phrase when you consider the suffering involved that day and for years afterwards.
I think art has to be created in the intention to be art. this wasn't intending to be anything other than the death of thousands of innocents so having thought about it I would say....No it's not!
no it means you need to disguise your veiled "let's have a go at the yanks cos they deserve it" mentality a lot better. What if he said some other attrocity was a work of art, would you have your head so far up his 4rse?
Just so you know though, I also deplore World War I but love the poetry of Wilfred Owen.
And being affected by the photography taken after the bombing of Nagasaki isn't a thumbs up for the H bomb. It's art, pure and simple - as is the exhbibition at Hiroshima which features the patterned kimonos that melted onto the skin of the civilians who wore them.
Just because it's upsetting doesn't mean it's not art.
Still you can't beat an A3 painting of Xena Warrior Princess on a motorbike can you?
It would have been possible to fly two airliners into targets that killed many more people. It would have been possible to fly two airliners into targets of greater strategic importance.
The attack on the twin towers was undoubtedly partly chosen because there was a symbolic cachet to destroying two such icons of America and its values, therefore in that sense it was undeniably artistic.
I don't think anyone is suggesting 'artistic' was being used by Hirst with any positive connotations though.
As someone said above it's only art if the artist set out to make a work of art. Now I think old bed linen and co had bloody murder on their minds not painting by numbers!
I can see what he's saying but one man art is always anothers rubbish, tragedy etc etc
Let's face it, we were all morbidly stuck to our televisions, so yes I think he has a point.
The Falling MAn image is very memorable indeed but my favourite moving photo of those days is the firemen hoisting the flag amongst the wreckage.