Enough is enough

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-118716 5/Nine-arrested-masked-mobs-march-Muslim-extre mists-turns-violent.html

Yesterday! What can we expect in the future?

Interesting to note that the police didn't dive in hard, when the Islamists protested during an Army march in Luton earlier this year, in fact if one looks at the picture there doesn't seem many around at all.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/05/25/arti cle-1187165-03EA02F5000005DC-710_634x418.jpg

[Gromit]

AOG

It is you who appears not to be able to see what is written before you.

I wrote "I can see only four people on both photos. There may have been a few more that were not in those shots'

and somehow you have read that as
"Four, now you have increased it to six'.

No I haven't increased it to six. I have said there are four people in the the two press photos.

[sp1814]

Blimey!

I can't believe how thick I've been!

The 'erroneous' picture wasn't a mistake, was it! The DM deliberately printed another picture because there were more Muslims in the shot with the green flags!!!

I'm slightly in awe at that. That's somehow disgusting and brilliant at the same time.

God, I wish there was someone on AB who could read what it says on the flags. Wouldn't be hilarious if they all read "LAST FEW DAYS LEFT OF THE CARPET SALE AT VISHNU'S WORLD OF RUGS".

God bless the Daily Mail say I.

[anotheoldgit]

Gromit

That is a hindu child of a Tamil Tiger supporter protesting about the Sri Lanka.

Does it matter whether or not the child was Hindu, Muslin, Sikh, or Roman Catholic even?

I was merely pointing out to keyplus's statement that began, 'When people go on protest', and ended 'Even if they had decided not to have stayed behind then at least they wouldn't have been right at the front.'

keyplus was referring to children at protests, but of course you had to highjack my reply with your usual 'superior knowledge' that in fact the child was Hindu.

[anotheoldgit]

Gromit

It is you who appears not to be able to see what is written before you.

I am quite capable of seeing what is written before me, more than can be said about you.

No I haven't increased it to six. I have said there are four people in the the two press photos.

This is what you also said:

I wonder how they erroneously used the picture of the large menacing crowd instead of the half dozen wallies?

How long in 'Gromit's World' has half dozen, no longer meant six????????

[Gromit]

AOG

Whether there were 4 or 6 or 8, it is not the huge crowd as shown in the Mails false picture.

Which part of that sentence do you not understand?

[anotheoldgit]

Once again you try and escape my true interpretation on what you said by asking another question, a ploy often used by politicians, but much more expertly may I add?

No I haven't increased it to six. I have said there are four people in the the two press photos.

I wonder how they erroneously used the picture of the large menacing crowd instead of the half dozen wallies?

Both statements by you.

Whether there were 4 or 6 or 8, it is not the huge crowd as shown in the Mails false picture.

Yet another question entirely, and although you seem to be getting over confused, I am perfectly on the ball.

So I will answer this separate question ' No 4 or 6 or 8, is not the huge crowd shown in the picture'. which was far from huge say 30 plus?

[Gromit]

This will be my last post on this, and I will keep it simple so you can understand.

The photos showed four people. This may not have captured all the wallies who were abusing soldiers that day, which may have been half a dozen or 8 but not the multitude shown in the Mail.