Sir Keir Starmer Under, Fresh...
News0 min ago
Building 7 collapse.
How does a building collapse into its own footprint at freefall speed? What happened to the law of physics on this day? This building,lest we forget ,was NOT hit by a plane..
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by funkyrich. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Perlease! yes they where driven by GWB by remote control so he can enslave the world, mwahahaha! All the joists were made from bubble gum originally so the building would collapse! I think it was hit by a plane, wasn't? Or are we saying it was all camera trickery? Looks like the local asylum has left the back door open again!
1) What would be the point political or otherwise to destroy this building.
2) Conspiracy theorists will take even the thinnist things and turn them into evidence.
3) Did the building burn if so did it burn consistantly across a number of floors
4) Why would FEMA lie?
5) How many people would be involved in a conspiracy of this type, it would run into hundreds probably thousands bu t not one person has ever backed the conspircay.
6) Was that an orange or was it a painting of an Orange or a picture of an orange or an holgraphic representation of an orange. The camera often lies.
In short poppycock.
2) Conspiracy theorists will take even the thinnist things and turn them into evidence.
3) Did the building burn if so did it burn consistantly across a number of floors
4) Why would FEMA lie?
5) How many people would be involved in a conspiracy of this type, it would run into hundreds probably thousands bu t not one person has ever backed the conspircay.
6) Was that an orange or was it a painting of an Orange or a picture of an orange or an holgraphic representation of an orange. The camera often lies.
In short poppycock.
flobadob I was just taking the piddle out of the whole conspiracy theory cobblers. You must have heard the one where GWB odrered the attack and they where flown y by remote control and where not really passemger planes at all and a missile was fired at the pentagon and gawd knows what other horsesh1te.
What your video clip that you have linked to fails to show is the massive damage to the South side of WTC 7 that fatally compromised its structural integrity - Massive collateral damage caused by debris and pillars from the collapse of one of the major towers.
This is just one of many accounts of the damage to the building, prior to the collapse from one of the firefighting professionals attending, Captain Chris Boyle.
" So we go there and on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you
looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris
was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good. But they had a hose line operating. Like I said, it
was hitting the sidewalk across the street, but eventually they pulled back too.
Then we received an order from Fellini, we’re going to make a move on 7. That was the first time really my stomach
tightened up because the building didn’t look good. I was figuring probably the standpipe systems were shot. There
was no hydrant pressure. I wasn’t really keen on the idea. Then this other officer I’m standing next to said, that building
doesn’t look straight. So I’m standing there. I’m looking at the building. It didn’t look right, but, well, we’ll go in,
we’ll see.
So we gathered up rollups and most of us had masks at that time. We headed toward 7. And just around we were
about a hundred yards away and Butch Brandeis came running up. He said forget it, nobody’s going into 7, there’s
creaking, there are noises coming out of there, so we just stopped. And probably about 10 minutes after that, Visconti,
he was on West Street, and I guess he had another report of further damage either in some basements and
things like that, so Visconti said nobody goes into 7, so that was the final thing and that was abandoned.
Firehouse Magazine: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side?
Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it.
Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many?
There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered through there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably
a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all
right, we’ll head back to the command post."– Capt. Chris Boyle http://tinyurl.com/e7bzp "
This conspiracy theory has been done to death - every single inexplicable "fact" has been explained and debunked - frankly, this has turned into a Zombie conspiracy - it should just lie down and die.
This is just one of many accounts of the damage to the building, prior to the collapse from one of the firefighting professionals attending, Captain Chris Boyle.
" So we go there and on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you
looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris
was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good. But they had a hose line operating. Like I said, it
was hitting the sidewalk across the street, but eventually they pulled back too.
Then we received an order from Fellini, we’re going to make a move on 7. That was the first time really my stomach
tightened up because the building didn’t look good. I was figuring probably the standpipe systems were shot. There
was no hydrant pressure. I wasn’t really keen on the idea. Then this other officer I’m standing next to said, that building
doesn’t look straight. So I’m standing there. I’m looking at the building. It didn’t look right, but, well, we’ll go in,
we’ll see.
So we gathered up rollups and most of us had masks at that time. We headed toward 7. And just around we were
about a hundred yards away and Butch Brandeis came running up. He said forget it, nobody’s going into 7, there’s
creaking, there are noises coming out of there, so we just stopped. And probably about 10 minutes after that, Visconti,
he was on West Street, and I guess he had another report of further damage either in some basements and
things like that, so Visconti said nobody goes into 7, so that was the final thing and that was abandoned.
Firehouse Magazine: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side?
Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it.
Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many?
There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered through there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably
a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all
right, we’ll head back to the command post."– Capt. Chris Boyle http://tinyurl.com/e7bzp "
This conspiracy theory has been done to death - every single inexplicable "fact" has been explained and debunked - frankly, this has turned into a Zombie conspiracy - it should just lie down and die.
OK answer me this then.Why didn't this building collapse in Spain which had a much hotter fire and burned for much longer? Why can you not see the elephant in the room? Its so obvious that this 9/11 operation was an inside job from start to finish. The conspiracy theory is the official story surely..
-- answer removed --
No. The conspiracy theory is suddenly expert civil and mechanical armchair engineers shouting conspiracy! inside job! whilst conspicuously ignoring the 20 story fewking hole on the other side of the building.
The conspiracy nuts are the ones who, when challenged, ignore the challenge and move on to another apparently cast in iron fact, according to their recently acquired knowledge of architecture and engineering.
How about instead of cutting and pasting videos. you take the time to prove your hypothesis, instead of posting crap and then expecting others to debunk it?
The conspiracy nuts are the ones who, when challenged, ignore the challenge and move on to another apparently cast in iron fact, according to their recently acquired knowledge of architecture and engineering.
How about instead of cutting and pasting videos. you take the time to prove your hypothesis, instead of posting crap and then expecting others to debunk it?
Ankou:- The invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan for starters and to take over the oil fields.When people are in fear they look to their government for protection so what better way of achieving this end than a manufactured terrorist event and endless war on terror. The Rockefellers are most likely behind it along with Mossad.
I am prepared to have a conversation with someone who could show some original thought, rather than reposting the same old crap that has been circulating since the incident itself.
You post a video, which purports to be "evidence" of something that contravenes the stated story, or contravenes the laws of physics - but you dont explain why you think it does either! When challenged, you dont explain or expand or add anything to the knowledge - you just remain entrenched in your conspiracist mindset. I post evidence showing that there were perfectly ordinary, perfectly mundane, perfectly explicable reasons why WTC 7 came down and what do you do? Igore and move on to some other spurious point.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with having an open mind, or a sceptical mind - but you exhibit neither with your slavish adherence to a thoroughly debunked conspiracy theory. Scepticism means questioning everything, and weighing up the sources of your information - and Prison Planet and Alex Jones and Loose Change and Dylan Avery are not authoratitive or believable sources................
You post a video, which purports to be "evidence" of something that contravenes the stated story, or contravenes the laws of physics - but you dont explain why you think it does either! When challenged, you dont explain or expand or add anything to the knowledge - you just remain entrenched in your conspiracist mindset. I post evidence showing that there were perfectly ordinary, perfectly mundane, perfectly explicable reasons why WTC 7 came down and what do you do? Igore and move on to some other spurious point.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with having an open mind, or a sceptical mind - but you exhibit neither with your slavish adherence to a thoroughly debunked conspiracy theory. Scepticism means questioning everything, and weighing up the sources of your information - and Prison Planet and Alex Jones and Loose Change and Dylan Avery are not authoratitive or believable sources................
Latest Posts
Home & Garden1 min ago
Mass Job Losses In The Retail Sector...
News2 mins ago
It's Really Annoying When You Drop A...
News3 mins ago
News4 mins ago
ChatterBank10 mins ago
