I read in a book review the anecdote that a Merseyside milkman (remember milkmen?) "Put out a caravan fire with bottles of lemonade from his van. He increased their effectiveness by shaking them up first."
I have reason to doubt this, because a couple of years ago I attended a Christmas concert in a local music school and a candle on a window ledge set fire to some paper decorations, a teacher standing nearby grabbed a bottle of water to pour onto it, which happened to be of the fizzy, carbonated type, and as soon as the water touched the flame it flared up even worse and was eventually smothered with a blanket.
Would this have been due to the gas and would he have not been better to use milk?
The gas in fizzy drinks is carbon dioxide - fire extinguisher gas, but I would have thought the amount in it would have been negligible on the fire-extinguishing effect of the water. Shaking the bottles would, however, enable the milkman to "fire" the jet of water at the base of the fire, rather than just having to pour it.
I have always wondered why firefighters don't use carbonated water to extinguish fires. Thinking about the candle, could that be a wee bit like using water on a chip pan fire which is never recommended?
You can't be 100% sure that the water was only water without alcohol added. Scientific experiments need a more controlled environment and 'ingredients'.
Meanwhile - I am away to turn the heating up because I am freeeezing.
prudie; Please be careful and keep us posted, there may be though a difference between drowning the single flame directly, as with the flame of a candle, and the wider flames of a paper decoration.
Corby, 'Water' fire extinguishers all use Carbon Dioxide. There is a CO2 cartridge, when you activate the extinguisher the cartridge is pierced and the CO2 released. The gas pressure forces out the water. Simple and effective.