Crosswords1 min ago
Maths: Discovered Or Invented?
”Magic Numbers: Hannah Fry’s Mysterious World of Maths”, a BBC Four documentary series in which Dr Hannah Fry explores the mystery of maths and asks “Is maths invented like a language or is it discovered and part of the fabric of the universe?”
https:/
Your thoughts?
https:/
Your thoughts?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Jim
Isn't that kind of thing just awesome?
But that kind of fits with my beer-soaked human construct thing.
Accepting that sqrt(-1) is a valid and useful concept is entirely human. THere's no real-life situation (such as counting apples, or pears) that naturally drives us to think of sqrt(-1) as a part of the commonsense world.
INstead, it takes a leap of imagination and creativity (both utterly human activities) to see that this new way of describing certain aspects of the universe helps us to develop mathematical models that provide insigts into physical phenomena - such as the relationship between current and voltage in a large power generator, for example.
I have to be at a meeting at 8am local time: 7am in the UK, so i'll be off to sleep now, but will continue tomorrow if this continues..
Isn't that kind of thing just awesome?
But that kind of fits with my beer-soaked human construct thing.
Accepting that sqrt(-1) is a valid and useful concept is entirely human. THere's no real-life situation (such as counting apples, or pears) that naturally drives us to think of sqrt(-1) as a part of the commonsense world.
INstead, it takes a leap of imagination and creativity (both utterly human activities) to see that this new way of describing certain aspects of the universe helps us to develop mathematical models that provide insigts into physical phenomena - such as the relationship between current and voltage in a large power generator, for example.
I have to be at a meeting at 8am local time: 7am in the UK, so i'll be off to sleep now, but will continue tomorrow if this continues..
talbot 21:52, it makes more sense now than reverting to a metric figure. The world of geometry etc would look very different whilst actually not being different, eg if there were say 1000 newdegrees in a circle then the internal angles of a polygon would now add up to (S-2)*500 rather than the now familiar (S-2)*180. So it would be a major upheaval to change in all the text books and school curriculums etc now. The French tried it with time briefly and soon reverted back, though there are 10 hour clocks in a Paris museum.
// Ad to PP - half the fun of these is to think for oneself.//
yeah but no but ....but not to re-invent the wheel ....
Hey I have thought of a wonderful poem - no one has thought of before
to be or not to be ....yes yes that is the question er er whether it is ...
The idea is to think for oneself ( step aside ABers!) but not laboriously go thro what someone has done much better 1,000 y ago. - or reinvent the vector notation that Mobius did in 1860.....
The History of Maff courses that were brought in post war
MIGHT have been in response to the impasses of the thirties of theoretical physics. Didnt Heisenberg reinvent matrix math to describe his discoveries? And someone stick up their hand and say - this was all done ( the maff side of course) fifty y ago?
Prince de Broglie also did article-wave duality 1926 but likened it to a surfer on a wave.
everyone ( at the solvay conference) saw the idea was right
but the analogy was wrong because the surfer represented the centre of the wave - uh -uh - it doesnt have one - being a wave.
and so it was decided world wide to have English courses ( sort of) (that is history and philosophy of maff) so that the pointy headed intellectuals could describe to us normals what they had written ( discovered, invented or made up ) rather than just wave their hands and comment " this is so....so....ow you say.....difficile!"
The standard of discussion here isnt high - I notice: "imaginary isnt imaginary" is causing some squawking and protesting.....
yeah but no but ....but not to re-invent the wheel ....
Hey I have thought of a wonderful poem - no one has thought of before
to be or not to be ....yes yes that is the question er er whether it is ...
The idea is to think for oneself ( step aside ABers!) but not laboriously go thro what someone has done much better 1,000 y ago. - or reinvent the vector notation that Mobius did in 1860.....
The History of Maff courses that were brought in post war
MIGHT have been in response to the impasses of the thirties of theoretical physics. Didnt Heisenberg reinvent matrix math to describe his discoveries? And someone stick up their hand and say - this was all done ( the maff side of course) fifty y ago?
Prince de Broglie also did article-wave duality 1926 but likened it to a surfer on a wave.
everyone ( at the solvay conference) saw the idea was right
but the analogy was wrong because the surfer represented the centre of the wave - uh -uh - it doesnt have one - being a wave.
and so it was decided world wide to have English courses ( sort of) (that is history and philosophy of maff) so that the pointy headed intellectuals could describe to us normals what they had written ( discovered, invented or made up ) rather than just wave their hands and comment " this is so....so....ow you say.....difficile!"
The standard of discussion here isnt high - I notice: "imaginary isnt imaginary" is causing some squawking and protesting.....
Hi Candee !
the set book for the OU was
Amazon.co.uk User Recommendation
which should be Jeremy Gray Ideas of Space
£13 cheapest on Amazon
He had to fill in teaching us thickos on the Open Uni - I did a few of the courses up to 1985 ( eek but I have a long memory )
I had a lot of respect for those toots who used by day to teach the young Einsteins like Jim by day and instead of seettling down and watching Coronation St would instead roll up their sleeves and try to teach us over thirties. They said they enjoyed it
the set book for the OU was
Amazon.co.uk User Recommendation
which should be Jeremy Gray Ideas of Space
£13 cheapest on Amazon
He had to fill in teaching us thickos on the Open Uni - I did a few of the courses up to 1985 ( eek but I have a long memory )
I had a lot of respect for those toots who used by day to teach the young Einsteins like Jim by day and instead of seettling down and watching Coronation St would instead roll up their sleeves and try to teach us over thirties. They said they enjoyed it
yeah oh that one
Hamilton was trying to enlarge complex number into three
using i,j and k
and he couldnt get it to gel
( alot of this around in 1860 - Maxwell couldnt unify the e-m equations without adding a liddle ( j ) term)
and he was walking along the canal in Dublin
and thought ooo I know..... ijk=-1
and it was ! sort of - he got consistency
Nowadays you just look at them ( quaternions ) and think o yeah very interesting
and if you look here
https:/
scroll down to History
and you will see a photie of the plaque on the very bridge on the very canal where the unifying concept struck him!
I think Polya ( how to solve it) has something to say about this
Hamilton was trying to enlarge complex number into three
using i,j and k
and he couldnt get it to gel
( alot of this around in 1860 - Maxwell couldnt unify the e-m equations without adding a liddle ( j ) term)
and he was walking along the canal in Dublin
and thought ooo I know..... ijk=-1
and it was ! sort of - he got consistency
Nowadays you just look at them ( quaternions ) and think o yeah very interesting
and if you look here
https:/
scroll down to History
and you will see a photie of the plaque on the very bridge on the very canal where the unifying concept struck him!
I think Polya ( how to solve it) has something to say about this
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.