ChatterBank1 min ago
Inside the mind of turd.
16 Answers
On West Derby Road there's a Church, thoughtfully sprayed on the wall for our perusal and digestion are the words "Tuebrook grasses", it then goes on that "Reece" and this is the telling bit "is the VICTIM".
Victim of what?
Surely (alledgedly) he's the perpetrator?
Unless the author suggests that the Church has borne false witness against him/her?
Shami Chakrabati decrys the idea of naming and shaming criminals, but they're not so shy when it comes to naming others.
I expect I'll read of a burnt down Church in Tuebrook soon....
Victim of what?
Surely (alledgedly) he's the perpetrator?
Unless the author suggests that the Church has borne false witness against him/her?
Shami Chakrabati decrys the idea of naming and shaming criminals, but they're not so shy when it comes to naming others.
I expect I'll read of a burnt down Church in Tuebrook soon....
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by 123everton. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
The question wasn't very clear, granted.
But the story has been national news for about a year.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/ 7217607.stm
But the story has been national news for about a year.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/ 7217607.stm
It's got nothing to do with Rhys Jones as VIC said.
Someone from the Church (?) has informed the Police about somebody (Reece?) and his criminal actions, as a result "Tuebrook grasses" has been daubed on the side of the building, Reece is the unfortunate victim of being "grassed up" apparently.
It's not that they've sprayed a Church that bothers me (I hate all graffiti) but such and such is a grass is often to be seen painted on walls, the notion that he could be a "victim" for being told on is laughable.
Chakrabati etal dislike the naming and shaming of criminals, but they on the other hand are'nt shy about naming grasses etc.
Is that any clearer for you all?
Someone from the Church (?) has informed the Police about somebody (Reece?) and his criminal actions, as a result "Tuebrook grasses" has been daubed on the side of the building, Reece is the unfortunate victim of being "grassed up" apparently.
It's not that they've sprayed a Church that bothers me (I hate all graffiti) but such and such is a grass is often to be seen painted on walls, the notion that he could be a "victim" for being told on is laughable.
Chakrabati etal dislike the naming and shaming of criminals, but they on the other hand are'nt shy about naming grasses etc.
Is that any clearer for you all?
"No that liberty should stand up for people who want to live freely"
It does.
"rather than seek to defend those who wish to silence others with threats and intimidation. "
It doesn't.The point about protecting civil liberties and human rights is that they must apply to everyone to be worth anything.
It does.
"rather than seek to defend those who wish to silence others with threats and intimidation. "
It doesn't.The point about protecting civil liberties and human rights is that they must apply to everyone to be worth anything.
What does 'the public naming of criminals' mean?
Having tabloid newspapers print the names of peadophiles for the titilation of their readers, resulting in driving peadophiles underground and attacks on paediatricians and overall endangering children? No, I don't agree with it.
Reporting the details of criminals in the press at the point of conviction? Fine.
It's not possible to give a blanket response.
Is it possible to be a victim by being grassed up? Yes, if you're not guilty, obviously it is.
Do you not support due process or something? Do you think mob justice is the way forward? I can't believe you do.
You're creating a false dichotomy here.
Having tabloid newspapers print the names of peadophiles for the titilation of their readers, resulting in driving peadophiles underground and attacks on paediatricians and overall endangering children? No, I don't agree with it.
Reporting the details of criminals in the press at the point of conviction? Fine.
It's not possible to give a blanket response.
Is it possible to be a victim by being grassed up? Yes, if you're not guilty, obviously it is.
Do you not support due process or something? Do you think mob justice is the way forward? I can't believe you do.
You're creating a false dichotomy here.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.