//My personal opinion is that all anyone can know about god is that there is no evidence of his existence. Anything else would be speculation and wishful thinking. Any further discussion on the subject is pointless.//
Wait up! I haven't heard the fat lady sing . . .
Establishing 'What is the truth...' about anything, presupposes an understanding of the means and process by which truth is determined for which a prerequisite understanding of what 'truth' is, is essential.
Truth, lies not in one's belief in the validity of the words spoken, however strong the conviction of the speaker or listener, but in the correlation of the words to the reality to which the words refer and from which the words derive their meaning. Truth invariably corresponds to reality and understanding reality, the means by which we apprehend and comprehend reality, determines ones ability to differentiate that which asserted to be the truth from that which is in fact the truth.
To know about 'God' is to know that to which in reality the term 'God' refers which in turn requires an essential understanding of the nature of reality which determines in what capacity that to which the term 'God' refers can or cannot and does or does not exist.
To know 'what is the truth' one must first learn the truth about knowledge, from whence it comes and the means and process by which knowledge is obtained, integrated, correlated and verified. There is no shortcut to bypass an understanding of reason nor why such an understanding is essential to establishing what the truth is . . . about anything.
BTW, just so happens I do know a thing or two about 'God' but I agree entirely that any further discussion about the truth of what I know would be pointless . . . without a prerequisite mutual understanding of, among other things, the process of reason and what knowledge is.
Now then . . . where's the fat lady?