ChatterBank0 min ago
I am God's Newest Prophet
48 Answers
Hear Ye, Hear Ye. I am the Prophet Beso.
By reason of miracle I have recently beome aware of the most intimate beliefs of THE ONE TRUE GOD and as a consequence my every thought is entangled with that of THE LORD! Ask me anything and by virtue of my intimate knowledge of THE LORD I can tell you the ultimate truth about everything.
All previous prophets told the WORD OF GOD but He has vested in me the latest of all truth and commanded that devotees to previous prophets accept my word as THE WORD OF GOD ALMIGHTY, THE ONE TRUE GOD. This truth will be the ultimate truth that He will never change again.
Please tell me your prejudices and I will ask THE LORD for His judgement.
--------
Now please explain to me why a plethora of men from the past have said much the same thing .......... and you believe them but not me.
By reason of miracle I have recently beome aware of the most intimate beliefs of THE ONE TRUE GOD and as a consequence my every thought is entangled with that of THE LORD! Ask me anything and by virtue of my intimate knowledge of THE LORD I can tell you the ultimate truth about everything.
All previous prophets told the WORD OF GOD but He has vested in me the latest of all truth and commanded that devotees to previous prophets accept my word as THE WORD OF GOD ALMIGHTY, THE ONE TRUE GOD. This truth will be the ultimate truth that He will never change again.
Please tell me your prejudices and I will ask THE LORD for His judgement.
--------
Now please explain to me why a plethora of men from the past have said much the same thing .......... and you believe them but not me.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by beso. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Just fancied a bit of cutting and pasting......
“It would be intolerant if I advocated the banning of religion, but of course I never have. I merely give robust expression to views about the cosmos and morality with which you happen to disagree. You interpret that as ‘intolerance’ because of the weirdly privileged status of religion, which expects to get a free ride and not have to defend itself. If I wrote a book called The Socialist Delusion or The Monetarist Delusion, you would never use a word like intolerance. But The God Delusion sounds automatically intolerant. Why? What’s the difference? I have a (you might say fanatical) desire for people to use their own minds and make their own choices, based upon publicly available evidence. Religious fanatics want people to switch off their own minds, ignore the evidence, and blindly follow a holy book based upon private ‘revelation’. There is a huge difference.”
― Richard Dawkins
“It would be intolerant if I advocated the banning of religion, but of course I never have. I merely give robust expression to views about the cosmos and morality with which you happen to disagree. You interpret that as ‘intolerance’ because of the weirdly privileged status of religion, which expects to get a free ride and not have to defend itself. If I wrote a book called The Socialist Delusion or The Monetarist Delusion, you would never use a word like intolerance. But The God Delusion sounds automatically intolerant. Why? What’s the difference? I have a (you might say fanatical) desire for people to use their own minds and make their own choices, based upon publicly available evidence. Religious fanatics want people to switch off their own minds, ignore the evidence, and blindly follow a holy book based upon private ‘revelation’. There is a huge difference.”
― Richard Dawkins
S_C // And his question states he think's we believed previous so called prophets which is inacurate //
Both those who believed and those who didn't belive are correct and part of my covenant.
I could explain it to you by God's will is so mysterious that you could never understand. That is why you must accept what I say even though it makes no sense to ordinary people.
Both those who believed and those who didn't belive are correct and part of my covenant.
I could explain it to you by God's will is so mysterious that you could never understand. That is why you must accept what I say even though it makes no sense to ordinary people.
elgreco, //I just don't get the constant bickering between 'believers' and 'non-believers'.... I also find it just as distasteful that all the non-believers seem to think that it is their mission to make christians, muslims or whatever see the error of their ways. Lighten up everybody. //
It seemed to me that you were objecting to people challenging belief - or otherwise.
S_C. the question is clearly aimed at those of a religious persuasion. As I said, I think you've misunderstood it.
Noraq, congratulations for giving attribution. It doesn't happen often around here. ;o)
It seemed to me that you were objecting to people challenging belief - or otherwise.
S_C. the question is clearly aimed at those of a religious persuasion. As I said, I think you've misunderstood it.
Noraq, congratulations for giving attribution. It doesn't happen often around here. ;o)
ha ha
i neither accept nore believe therefore your comments are irrelevent to me
anyway as your explination would still leave me with a lack of understanding " accordingto you " then the question would be are you sure your the one to partake in the role you have given yourself.
i wont comment again as there really is no point as my perspective and " obvious " inability to understand would make it useless !!!
i neither accept nore believe therefore your comments are irrelevent to me
anyway as your explination would still leave me with a lack of understanding " accordingto you " then the question would be are you sure your the one to partake in the role you have given yourself.
i wont comment again as there really is no point as my perspective and " obvious " inability to understand would make it useless !!!
It just doesnt have the ring of veracity Beso.
1. No quotations and coy numbered references to the holy book ( inserted into the text in that way in the hope that readers will seek out said holy book, see the light, and become a convert)
2. No antiscientific text, or misrepresentation of fact, distorted by the prism of faith.
Epic Fail! ;)
1. No quotations and coy numbered references to the holy book ( inserted into the text in that way in the hope that readers will seek out said holy book, see the light, and become a convert)
2. No antiscientific text, or misrepresentation of fact, distorted by the prism of faith.
Epic Fail! ;)
-- answer removed --
The only true church in these here parts is the First Church of Answerbank, pardner... Meet you at high noon outside the R&S saloon...
Praise Ab Editor
By the way, We have the answer, and it's forty two...
Praise Ab Editor
By the way, We have the answer, and it's forty two...
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.