Ratter, I’m not sure at which point I lost you. Defining ‘the unexplained’; saying ‘Be careful what you wish for’ ; or responding to Pixie’s comment about demons?
The first could be interpreted as UFOs, telekinesis, water-divining, clairvoyance, doppelgangers, déjà vu, etc, etc., so not necessarily just ‘things that go bump in the night’. The ‘unexplained’ doesn’t suffice. Pixie, please take note.
The second, personally I wouldn’t wish for a repeat of my ‘ghostly’ experiences.
The third, several of the faithful of assorted flavours around here believe that demons are real. We’ve talked about ‘them’ often.
Ludwig, you agree with me too. I said that at 22:46 Sunday. ;o)
Mibs, haaaa! Best you don’t ask perhaps. ;o)
Pixie, you’re telling intelligent people that they didn’t experience what they say they experienced? How do you know they didn’t and what qualifies you to contradict them? They’ve been there – you haven’t. Do you really think you know more than they do? You say “despite all the evidence to the contrary….”, but there is no evidence to the contrary. Absence of evidence does not equate to evidence of absence.