Jobs & Education2 mins ago
Does It Say In The Quran That You Should Kill Jews/christians/unbelievers?
218 Answers
Why would god create everyone and then tell one group to kill another? That makes no sense if it's true
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Henrietta. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.1.[9.29] Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.
The perfect example of the prophet and the guide to life is found not only in the Koran, but also the sayings and actions of God's messenger as recorded in the Hadith, Henrietta. Here's a fine example (picked at random - there are hundreds more like it):
"Some people from the tribe of 'Ukl came to the Prophet and embraced Islam. The climate of Medina did not suit them, so the Prophet ordered them to go to the (herd of milch) camels of charity and to drink, their milk and urine (as a medicine). They did so, and after they had recovered from their ailment (became healthy) they turned renegades (reverted from Islam) and killed the shepherd of the camels and took the camels away. The Prophet sent (some people) in their pursuit and so they were (caught and) brought, and the Prophets ordered that their hands and legs should be cut off and that their eyes should be branded with heated pieces of iron, and that their cut hands and legs should not be cauterized, till they die.".
Obviously the Arabic may allow of more than one interpretation, and I will be prepared to accept (if an expert can explain it to me) that the cutting off of the feet and hands and the branding of the eyes may be some kind of metaphor.
"Some people from the tribe of 'Ukl came to the Prophet and embraced Islam. The climate of Medina did not suit them, so the Prophet ordered them to go to the (herd of milch) camels of charity and to drink, their milk and urine (as a medicine). They did so, and after they had recovered from their ailment (became healthy) they turned renegades (reverted from Islam) and killed the shepherd of the camels and took the camels away. The Prophet sent (some people) in their pursuit and so they were (caught and) brought, and the Prophets ordered that their hands and legs should be cut off and that their eyes should be branded with heated pieces of iron, and that their cut hands and legs should not be cauterized, till they die.".
Obviously the Arabic may allow of more than one interpretation, and I will be prepared to accept (if an expert can explain it to me) that the cutting off of the feet and hands and the branding of the eyes may be some kind of metaphor.
The example I cited wwas from one of the more respected compilers of hadith, Henrietta. Here's a link:
http:// www.sah ih-bukh ari.com /
http://
Oh dear, Sandy. Sorry, mate, I'm going to have to educate you:
(Re 7th century Arabia)
"Another time-honoured way of preserving the balance of power was the ghazu or raid, which was a constant occupation and almost a national sport. In time of hardship, members of one tribe would raid the territory of one of its enemies in the hope of carrying off camels, cattle or other goods. Bloodshed was avoided where possible, because this would lead to vendetta. Again, robbery was NOT considered immoral unless you stole from ...kinsmen.... The ghazu ensured a reasonable turn-over of wealth and meant that what food and goods were available were, in a rough and ready way, shared between (sic) the groups which were competing for them".
(Re 7th century Arabia)
"Another time-honoured way of preserving the balance of power was the ghazu or raid, which was a constant occupation and almost a national sport. In time of hardship, members of one tribe would raid the territory of one of its enemies in the hope of carrying off camels, cattle or other goods. Bloodshed was avoided where possible, because this would lead to vendetta. Again, robbery was NOT considered immoral unless you stole from ...kinsmen.... The ghazu ensured a reasonable turn-over of wealth and meant that what food and goods were available were, in a rough and ready way, shared between (sic) the groups which were competing for them".
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.