The Theists Will Love This Lol !! :-)

[RATTER15]

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/02/11/quantum-equation-suggests-the-big-bang-never-occurred-the-universe-has-no-beginning/

[joggerjayne]

Just Googled Kaley Cuocu.

One feels that one might.

[shoota]

I've had that feeling for a while JJ.

(Have you seen those zips?)

[joggerjayne]

Zips?

[shoota]

On the pic I gave a link to...

[joggerjayne]

Oh yes, sorry.

Wasn't that a different person?

[Old_Geezer]

If something is creating stuff (space/matter/time) "as it goes", I'm unsure one needs to postulate an infinite density. Before something exists it isn't there to be part of anything dense. Or it that too simplistic ? It just seems to me that to consider the centre of a "Big Bang" an infinitely dense point might have been a way to categorise/describe the situation and try to move on with the theory, without needing to "cross all 't's and dot all 'i's" first.

[RATTER15]

//What does Stephen Hawking have to say about this??// Stephen Hawking has been on the show and is a big fan!

Shoota, the pic you linked to was of Melissa Rauch, who plays "Bernadette" also in the same show.

[RATTER15]

Penny = Kaley Cuocu :-)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMALWe0IPyA

[venator]

Excellent!

[jim360]

This show appears to be saying that physics nerds can easily pull attractive girls but are oblivious to it... the first part, at least, is not something I've experienced personally. Oh, well.

[RATTER15]

Jim, you need to watch the programme, It will amuse you.

[jim360]

I have watched the programme. It doesn't.

[RATTER15]

Ok Jim :-)

[shoota]

//Shoota, the pic you linked to was of Melissa Rauch, who plays "Bernadette" also in the same show//

Yes, I was postulating the theory of big bangs and even bigger bangs by contrasting the physical conformation of two stars....

[RATTER15]

^^^ as long as you know where to shoot!!

[goodlife]

For intelligent Designer brought forth the universe is in harmony with what some scientists call the “big-bang” theory of creation.

In recent years this theory has gained ascendancy over the “steady-state” theory, which claims that the universe has existed eternally, is without beginning. But you do not have to rely on the shifting sands of modern scientific theory to prove that there is a Creator. For the Creator himself makes clear who and what he is.

This is what Jehovah has said, . . . ‘I myself have made the earth and have created even man upon it. I—my own hands have stretched out the heavens, and all the army of them I have commanded.’” (Isa. 45:11, 12)

The evidence of his creatorship is to be observed and marveled at in so many things that we see around us,which you all miss out on.

[mibn2cweus]

Postulating the existence of a god lies beyond the threshold of reason and understanding, the event horizon at which the further pursuit of knowledge is cashed in for a ticket to the realm of make believe and preferred delusion.

[atalanta]

alright, goodlife, how did god create light before he created the sun and the moon ? Just saying that you created something doesn't mean you did it. Mussolini claimed to have made the trains run on time, but they never did. You claim there is proof that god made the universe. Please let us have this proof so we can check it scientifically, the way all claims must be tested before they can be universally accepted as the best explanation. And it's no good quoting your favourite fairy stories in your favourite story-book. I have a book of fairy stories too. It is very good for amusing the children.

[goodlife]

Its simple really. Everything has a designer and a maker. For example something simple as a watch - did it come about by itself? What about a house? If I left the bricks and mortar together with all the other bits & pieces would it suddenly put itself together. How silly can you get. The universe has to have a designer and a maker - most scientists now agree with that.

[jim360]

No they don't.