ChatterBank3 mins ago
Do Christians And Muslims Worship The Same God.
186 Answers
Hi There I saw a post on facebook that said Muslims and Christians do not worship the same God. And I copied it on to my wall. Anyway one of my really pc friends said that is not true and it is hate crime to say that and if it is not removed she will phone the police. But surely that is true. Muslims worship Allah where as Christians worship God?
Answers
Not being a user of Facebook I thought gordie had put the message up in his living room. (copied it on to my wall)
08:59 Wed 23rd Dec 2015
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Thanks Khandro.
Naomi ////Things would be even simpler if they stopped worshipping altogether.////
If your example is to go by then by stopping to worship (or believe in it) has not made it simpler but has very much confused you and many more here.
OK, Trinity, Even the Bible available today has nothing to do with trinity in it. Trinity has been added by the church and majority of the Christians of today are not following Jesus (pbuh), they are following St Paul and then many others.
Naomi ////Things would be even simpler if they stopped worshipping altogether.////
If your example is to go by then by stopping to worship (or believe in it) has not made it simpler but has very much confused you and many more here.
OK, Trinity, Even the Bible available today has nothing to do with trinity in it. Trinity has been added by the church and majority of the Christians of today are not following Jesus (pbuh), they are following St Paul and then many others.
naomi; I'm not sure that 'confused' is the right word, but you are most certainly prejudiced; adamant that your view is correct, beyond question and that (and you are not alone on these pages) anyone of a different opinion is somehow stupid.
Stubborn atheism is no better than the intolerance of the fanatically religious.
Stubborn atheism is no better than the intolerance of the fanatically religious.
A more interesting comparison is not that between the God worshipped by Christians and Muslims respectively, but the contrast between their definition of the perfect man. That is to say the life and example of Christ on the one hand, and the life and example of Mohammed on the other.
I don't know what goes on in these inter-faith "dialogues", but I find it difficult to imagine that the Christian who thinks Jesus is the Son of God and the Prince of Peace could view the Prophet with anything other than horror. Equally I cannot conceive that the person who thinks that Mohammed represents the finest example of human conduct could view the Jesus of the New Testament (not the Jesus of the Koran) with anything but contempt.
I don't know what goes on in these inter-faith "dialogues", but I find it difficult to imagine that the Christian who thinks Jesus is the Son of God and the Prince of Peace could view the Prophet with anything other than horror. Equally I cannot conceive that the person who thinks that Mohammed represents the finest example of human conduct could view the Jesus of the New Testament (not the Jesus of the Koran) with anything but contempt.
-- answer removed --
Khandro, I googled the definition of ‘prejudice’ and first on the list was this
// preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.//
My opinions are based on reason and experience, and I’m always willing to offer rational argument to support those opinions. Therefore prejudice is not something I can justly be accused of. Try again.
And speaking of prejudice, on another thread you said of Stephen Fry, //There are many [atheists], you know, who are capable of giving a coherent case for atheism without resorting to the kind of language of this coke-snorting, woman hating, buggerer.//. A damning assessment. Despite several requests, you consistently declined to tell me what he said to provoke that outburst, and therefore I can only conclude that your censure of him emanates not from experience or reason, but from blind prejudice. Atheists who are capable of offering reasoned argument scare the hell out of you. You have no answers which is why you regularly, and quite amusingly, resort to attacking the messenger, as you’ve done here. As tedious as that is, old chap, it’s water off a duck’s back. If you want to be taken seriously you really must try harder, Khandro.
// preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.//
My opinions are based on reason and experience, and I’m always willing to offer rational argument to support those opinions. Therefore prejudice is not something I can justly be accused of. Try again.
And speaking of prejudice, on another thread you said of Stephen Fry, //There are many [atheists], you know, who are capable of giving a coherent case for atheism without resorting to the kind of language of this coke-snorting, woman hating, buggerer.//. A damning assessment. Despite several requests, you consistently declined to tell me what he said to provoke that outburst, and therefore I can only conclude that your censure of him emanates not from experience or reason, but from blind prejudice. Atheists who are capable of offering reasoned argument scare the hell out of you. You have no answers which is why you regularly, and quite amusingly, resort to attacking the messenger, as you’ve done here. As tedious as that is, old chap, it’s water off a duck’s back. If you want to be taken seriously you really must try harder, Khandro.
birdie; When I make a comparison between 'stubborn atheism' and the intolerance of the fanatically religious, I refer to these two positions as intellectual stances, how both positions are manifested is a separate matter.
You list atrocities carried out in the name of the fanatically religious and imply that the other group is innocent of such action, if this is your belief you lack knowledge of history, allow me to enlighten you. Far more deaths have been carried out by atheist regimes that even those through the history of Islamic and Christian fanaticism (which is saying something). Atheist, Joseph Stalin was directly responsible for the deaths of more than 50 million souls, mostly orthodox Christians and declared the Soviet Union to be an Atheist state. The atheist Mao, a similar number in China and a similar decree, mostly Confucianists and Buddhists. In North Korea, the atheist Dictator Kim il Sung was responsible for the deaths of around 2 million, mostly Buddhists, and forcing atheism on the rest, and the list goes on.
It is clear to me at least, that any form of extremism produces drastic consequences for humanity - as the Greeks taught; 'moderation in everything', - the 'Middle Way' dear boy, the middle way!
You list atrocities carried out in the name of the fanatically religious and imply that the other group is innocent of such action, if this is your belief you lack knowledge of history, allow me to enlighten you. Far more deaths have been carried out by atheist regimes that even those through the history of Islamic and Christian fanaticism (which is saying something). Atheist, Joseph Stalin was directly responsible for the deaths of more than 50 million souls, mostly orthodox Christians and declared the Soviet Union to be an Atheist state. The atheist Mao, a similar number in China and a similar decree, mostly Confucianists and Buddhists. In North Korea, the atheist Dictator Kim il Sung was responsible for the deaths of around 2 million, mostly Buddhists, and forcing atheism on the rest, and the list goes on.
It is clear to me at least, that any form of extremism produces drastic consequences for humanity - as the Greeks taught; 'moderation in everything', - the 'Middle Way' dear boy, the middle way!