ChatterBank1 min ago
Who Or What Created The Universe?
123 Answers
Dismiss God as the author and creator of the universe, but what is your hypothesis? Or are you simply satisfied to say, "I don't know?"
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If you pose a question you may get someone attempting to answer it from their own perspective. If you are then unpleasant and rude to that person, suggesting, for example that their beliefs are absurd, because they do not agree with you then you stop debate. Actually I would not want to be part of any belief system that encourages rudeness, unpleasantness and the like towards other people. Respect is a two way street....I respect other peoples beliefs and expect the same from them. It is a shame you don't.
This God did the creating.
https:/ /i.pini mg.com/ origina ls/af/4 a/75/af 4a7581e 5fad330 ab9143e a32693e c6.jpg
https:/
A God from nothing tends not to seem a better answer to many folk.
The uncertainty principle ensures anything than can happen, will; including the ultimate free lunch in the form of universes.
Anyway who's to say that existence of something rather than nothing, isn't the normal default ? That we should be accepting the universal as natural and be surprised if it weren't there (were that possible).
The uncertainty principle ensures anything than can happen, will; including the ultimate free lunch in the form of universes.
Anyway who's to say that existence of something rather than nothing, isn't the normal default ? That we should be accepting the universal as natural and be surprised if it weren't there (were that possible).
At least one argument for the existence of God ends up explaining that (a) there must be a cause for the Universe, and (b) this cause is "self-causing", thus neatly avoiding the "well who created God then?" thing.
But then, why not stop one step earlier? The Universe is perfectly capable of creating itself.
But then, why not stop one step earlier? The Universe is perfectly capable of creating itself.
Hey - just fresh from the translation movement:
but related
are God and Quran - ( here word of God - as in in the beginning was god and god was the word - hey I just made that up!) that they cant be co eternal because you have to have a mouth before you form the words
so uh-uh God comes first and then the word
so not co-eternal.....
and their answer
the orthodox muslims I mean?
off the top of the building!
that's the way to settle arguments
but related
are God and Quran - ( here word of God - as in in the beginning was god and god was the word - hey I just made that up!) that they cant be co eternal because you have to have a mouth before you form the words
so uh-uh God comes first and then the word
so not co-eternal.....
and their answer
the orthodox muslims I mean?
off the top of the building!
that's the way to settle arguments
Having thoroughly examined the evidence available to support, or otherwise, the theory that the God of Abraham created the universe, I conclude, for the following reasons, that the suggestion doesn’t stand up to rational scrutiny.
1. This is a omnipotent God who couldn’t find two human beings who were hiding from him.
2. This is an omnipotent God who was impotent against ancient chariots.
3. This is an omnipotent God who bitterly regretted his creation, but who nevertheless went on to make another disastrous mistake.
4. This is an omnipotent God who felt it necessary to appear on earth in the guise of a man, the intention being to save humanity from …… God.
Finally, and this is just musing - this is an omnipotent – and more to the point – a one and only God who has several names. If he is unique there is no reason for him to distinguish himself so I wonder why he felt the need for a name at all? Wouldn’t plain old ‘God’ have done?
I could go on but I won’t. Now seriously! Does any of that make any sense at all? If the universe was indeed ‘created’, common sense dictates that the creator wasn’t the God of Abraham. Therefore, I’ll stick with ‘Don’t know’. Anything else would be nothing more than disingenuous fantasy.
Over to you, Theland.
1. This is a omnipotent God who couldn’t find two human beings who were hiding from him.
2. This is an omnipotent God who was impotent against ancient chariots.
3. This is an omnipotent God who bitterly regretted his creation, but who nevertheless went on to make another disastrous mistake.
4. This is an omnipotent God who felt it necessary to appear on earth in the guise of a man, the intention being to save humanity from …… God.
Finally, and this is just musing - this is an omnipotent – and more to the point – a one and only God who has several names. If he is unique there is no reason for him to distinguish himself so I wonder why he felt the need for a name at all? Wouldn’t plain old ‘God’ have done?
I could go on but I won’t. Now seriously! Does any of that make any sense at all? If the universe was indeed ‘created’, common sense dictates that the creator wasn’t the God of Abraham. Therefore, I’ll stick with ‘Don’t know’. Anything else would be nothing more than disingenuous fantasy.
Over to you, Theland.
-- answer removed --