News6 mins ago
Capital Punishment.
171 Answers
If a referendum was held on whether or not to reintroduce the death penalty, how would you vote?
What moral basis would dictate your choice?
What moral basis would dictate your choice?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.This question is debated on here regularly and the same arguments come up over and again. Those who think it is acceptable will never change.
Just a couple of points, 10 Clarion St, the death penalty has been abolished permanently for ALL offences , treason was still a possible death penalty offence until after it was abolished for murder. But the death penalty no longer exists for any offence. It was finally abolished in 1998
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Murde r_(Abol ition_o f_Death _Penalt y)_Act_ 1965
Ian Brady has been mentioned, Brady was pleading for decades to be allowed to commit suicide by starving himself to death. But it was not allowed ,he was forcibly tube fed for over 10 years to ensure he really did stay in prison until the end of his natural life as the sentence demanded.
naomi, mentioned public safety as a reason for killing murderers , well locking them up until the end of their natural life as is done for anyone who gets a 'whole life tariff' will do that.
Repeat and multiple murderers are among those who can receive a whole life tariff so that is another argument settled.
I think nalit and I are the only ones on AB who have actually met and talked to murderers , all the ones I have met are just normal people who had a one off moment of rage or lost control during an argument or after abuse. A death penalty would have done nothing to stop them.
Just a couple of points, 10 Clarion St, the death penalty has been abolished permanently for ALL offences , treason was still a possible death penalty offence until after it was abolished for murder. But the death penalty no longer exists for any offence. It was finally abolished in 1998
https:/
Ian Brady has been mentioned, Brady was pleading for decades to be allowed to commit suicide by starving himself to death. But it was not allowed ,he was forcibly tube fed for over 10 years to ensure he really did stay in prison until the end of his natural life as the sentence demanded.
naomi, mentioned public safety as a reason for killing murderers , well locking them up until the end of their natural life as is done for anyone who gets a 'whole life tariff' will do that.
Repeat and multiple murderers are among those who can receive a whole life tariff so that is another argument settled.
I think nalit and I are the only ones on AB who have actually met and talked to murderers , all the ones I have met are just normal people who had a one off moment of rage or lost control during an argument or after abuse. A death penalty would have done nothing to stop them.
Finally I just want to show you this
https:/ /www.sm ithsoni anmag.c om/hist ory/yea rs-wron gful-im prisonm ent-ric ky-jack son-fin ally-fr ee-1809 61434/
39 years in jail for a murder he did not commit .
naomi, No I have not met all of the people who had committed murder .
But I have met and talked to at least 9 , which I think is 9 more than you.
https:/
39 years in jail for a murder he did not commit .
naomi, No I have not met all of the people who had committed murder .
But I have met and talked to at least 9 , which I think is 9 more than you.