What If The Labour Party Got Rid Of...
Politics3 mins ago
The Balance Of Probability
84 Answers
https:/
A hard nosed atheist might deny the results of their own logic and agree with Dawkins, who shows himself up as a clown in his pursuit of his God hatred.
Can you deny that the God theory has more credence than that put forward by this world renowned atheist?
A hard nosed atheist might deny the results of their own logic and agree with Dawkins, who shows himself up as a clown in his pursuit of his God hatred.
Can you deny that the God theory has more credence than that put forward by this world renowned atheist?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I have no problem with people who say they don't believe in God, but I don't understand those (like Dawkins and the regulars on here) who say there is no God.
Why, as Rod Liddle says in his excellent YouTube, 'The problem with Atheism' don't they say, "There probably is no God", and leave it at that?
Why, as Rod Liddle says in his excellent YouTube, 'The problem with Atheism' don't they say, "There probably is no God", and leave it at that?
Khandro, //there is no God. //
I don't believe Dawkins or any other thinking atheist says that.
See the atheist bus.
https:/
I don't believe Dawkins or any other thinking atheist says that.
See the atheist bus.
https:/
Bottom line for everyone, "Prove it."
As far as I've seen, that only happens on one side of the fence.
http://
As far as I've seen, that only happens on one side of the fence.
http://
n. So ooh childish! Humanism and atheism are not the same, someone of the British atheists may have donated some funding to that stupidly offensive stunt, but was it a democratic decision to do so by the society as a whole? I think not.
It gets worse; the word 'probably' was not used for intellectual reasons but to avoid the rules of advertising.
I'm surprised you associate yourself with it.
If Sadiq Khan banned it, for once he'd be right.
It gets worse; the word 'probably' was not used for intellectual reasons but to avoid the rules of advertising.
I'm surprised you associate yourself with it.
If Sadiq Khan banned it, for once he'd be right.
Khandro, //n. So ooh childish! //
This is supposed to be an intelligent discussion and your persistent rudeness does you no favours whatsoever in that department. It never has.
Atheists say there is ‘probably’ no God because there is no evidence for the existence of such an entity. If only religionists would exhibit a similar common sense attitude. Your claim that you’re offended by the slogan is, for me at least, neither here nor there. So you’re offended. So what? I’m offended too – by people like you who object to free thought and make every effort to silence anything that doesn’t support their own narrow-minded world vision.
This is supposed to be an intelligent discussion and your persistent rudeness does you no favours whatsoever in that department. It never has.
Atheists say there is ‘probably’ no God because there is no evidence for the existence of such an entity. If only religionists would exhibit a similar common sense attitude. Your claim that you’re offended by the slogan is, for me at least, neither here nor there. So you’re offended. So what? I’m offended too – by people like you who object to free thought and make every effort to silence anything that doesn’t support their own narrow-minded world vision.
Childish? No … not at all - but how about this? Is that childish?
https:/
or this:
https:/
https:/
or this:
https:/
n. I don't think the side of a bus is appropriate for either, having said that, Britain is still a Christian country, not atheist and not Muslim.
And your link says, "The campaign comes eight years after a controversial ‘atheist bus’ campaign by the British Humanist Association."
Not true, they did not initiate it, but (mistakenly, sez I) donated to it
And your link says, "The campaign comes eight years after a controversial ‘atheist bus’ campaign by the British Humanist Association."
Not true, they did not initiate it, but (mistakenly, sez I) donated to it
Khandro, //The Atheist Bus Campaign … was created by comedy writer Ariane Sherine and launched with official support from the British Humanist Association and Richard Dawkins.//
https:/
Why is it silly or a mistake to attempt to assuage irrational fear that has no foundation in reality, and yet often controls lives - to their detriment? That surely has to be far more commendable than preaching that disobedience heralds doom for all eternity? If an evil philosophy ever existed, it's that one. Repent what? Living life? How anyone can endorse that is utterly beyond me. Perhaps you can explain it.
https:/
Why is it silly or a mistake to attempt to assuage irrational fear that has no foundation in reality, and yet often controls lives - to their detriment? That surely has to be far more commendable than preaching that disobedience heralds doom for all eternity? If an evil philosophy ever existed, it's that one. Repent what? Living life? How anyone can endorse that is utterly beyond me. Perhaps you can explain it.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank5 mins ago
Are The West In The Grip Of The Woke...
News6 mins ago
Crosswords8 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles20 mins ago
Technology34 mins ago
