News2 mins ago
Origin Of Life.
102 Answers
https:/
Atheist, with a name like that, it seems you have already closed your mind and donned a straightjacket.
But to hold your belief, or lack thereof, I expect you to possess satisfying answers to questions such as these.
Atheist, with a name like that, it seems you have already closed your mind and donned a straightjacket.
But to hold your belief, or lack thereof, I expect you to possess satisfying answers to questions such as these.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
https:/
Given the overwhelming evidence for design, any opponents of this assertion must account for the origin of information.
Darwinian evolution has nothing constructive to say about it.
The scientific community can be very vicious. Any scientist not toeing the evolutionary party line risks his reputation, his research funding, even his career.
Sadly this has happened all too often.
Given the overwhelming evidence for design, any opponents of this assertion must account for the origin of information.
Darwinian evolution has nothing constructive to say about it.
The scientific community can be very vicious. Any scientist not toeing the evolutionary party line risks his reputation, his research funding, even his career.
Sadly this has happened all too often.
https:/
This is how the scientific orthodox hierarchy treat a free thinker. Michael Behe.
The evidence for I.D. is overwhelming, but the Darwinists hold the purse strings, and a consideration of anything outside of materialistic secularism will not be tolerated.
This is how the scientific orthodox hierarchy treat a free thinker. Michael Behe.
The evidence for I.D. is overwhelming, but the Darwinists hold the purse strings, and a consideration of anything outside of materialistic secularism will not be tolerated.
Theland, few will have the time or the interest to spend over 3 hours watching the videos you’ve posted on this thread. Apart from that it’s not surprising you haven’t received instant responses. You posted them in the middle of the night when most people are in the Land of Nod - so to speak.
Rather than rely upon others to speak for you in lengthy videos perhaps you should consider asking your questions directly.
Rather than rely upon others to speak for you in lengthy videos perhaps you should consider asking your questions directly.
There is no evidence whatsoever for intelligent design. Quite the opposite.
Evolution is self evident. An accumulation of small changes biased towards that which reproduces the most results in a large change over a long time. Exactly what we see after four billion years of life.
The fossil record and genetic analysis leave no room for doubt.
Evolution is self evident. An accumulation of small changes biased towards that which reproduces the most results in a large change over a long time. Exactly what we see after four billion years of life.
The fossil record and genetic analysis leave no room for doubt.
Most obvious conjecture is that life will spring up naturally from the ability of non-organic matter to self replicate, and gain complexity until sufficiently complex to start to be considered life with it's various specific functions. It's a big universe, the building blocks seem abound everywhere. Seems a shortish trip from non-organic to organic. Just the actual process needs to be uncovered.
Theland, have you never wondered why the people in the videos you post never actually offer proof that they and you are right? They talk of " researchers have calculated" etc etc. Who are these researchers, what are their qualifications, why do we never see evidence of the calculations? Making a video is not proof, yet you demand atheists give you proof when you offer none. My researchers calculate you never will but of course they cannot prove it.
