News1 min ago
Our Home - The Speck Of Dust
196 Answers
NASA has just released images of a black hole located in a distant galaxy.
It measures 40 billion km across - three million times the size of the Earth - and has been described by scientists as "a monster". The black hole is 500 MILLION TRILLION km away.
Logically, do those enormous distances not encourage the creationist fraternity to wonder if they’re mistaken? Do they not ask why, from this whole unimaginably vast universe, a creator God would have selected this minute speck of dust located somewhere near the outer reaches of a fairly minor galaxy – just one of an estimated 2000 billion galaxies each containing billions of stars – as home to his beloved(?) creation – man?
Personally, I cannot believe we’re that special. What say you?
https:/
It measures 40 billion km across - three million times the size of the Earth - and has been described by scientists as "a monster". The black hole is 500 MILLION TRILLION km away.
Logically, do those enormous distances not encourage the creationist fraternity to wonder if they’re mistaken? Do they not ask why, from this whole unimaginably vast universe, a creator God would have selected this minute speck of dust located somewhere near the outer reaches of a fairly minor galaxy – just one of an estimated 2000 billion galaxies each containing billions of stars – as home to his beloved(?) creation – man?
Personally, I cannot believe we’re that special. What say you?
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
//Nothing bonkers about Chuck Missler//
Beg to differ.
Listen to all of his lectures.
Listened to loads of his stuff....hes bonkers.
I first came across Chuck Missler In prison of all places. He used to be a regular guest on the James Whale late night radio show back in the 90's. Used to spout off about UFO's etc. He came out with some stuff that used to make me think a bit and then the internet (along with my freedom) came along when I was able to cross-reference him. I found him out to be a fat odious money grabbing creep.
Beg to differ.
Listen to all of his lectures.
Listened to loads of his stuff....hes bonkers.
I first came across Chuck Missler In prison of all places. He used to be a regular guest on the James Whale late night radio show back in the 90's. Used to spout off about UFO's etc. He came out with some stuff that used to make me think a bit and then the internet (along with my freedom) came along when I was able to cross-reference him. I found him out to be a fat odious money grabbing creep.
https:/
Try this part two at 49 minutes in.
The whole video is excellent, but this section proves something that demands a response.
Try this part two at 49 minutes in.
The whole video is excellent, but this section proves something that demands a response.
//Do they not ask why, from this whole unimaginably vast universe, a creator God would have selected this minute speck of dust located somewhere near the outer reaches of a fairly minor galaxy – just one of an estimated 2000 billion galaxies each containing billions of stars – as home to his beloved(?) creation – man?
What makes one think we are the one and only beloved creation among the 2000 billion galaxies?
What makes one think we are the one and only beloved creation among the 2000 billion galaxies?
THELAND, regarding the sevens in the Bible, it's based on work by Ivan Panin. He looked at Matthew 1:1-17 which shows the supposed genealogy of Jesus and gave instances of connexions with seven.
He said for example, there are seventy-two different words but glosses over the fact that's not a multiple of seven. Would it have been that hard for Matthew to have used two fewer unique words?
He uses all seventeen verses for some of his calculations but ignores the final six for a great big chunk of them.
He says, for example, the number of letters in the women's names totals fourteen which is correct but that's only because Mary (a major character, no?)appears in the final six verses so she's not counted.
Would you not think the hidden message, if true, would have included the mother of Christ?
You don't think it's because the theory falls apart do you?
He said for example, there are seventy-two different words but glosses over the fact that's not a multiple of seven. Would it have been that hard for Matthew to have used two fewer unique words?
He uses all seventeen verses for some of his calculations but ignores the final six for a great big chunk of them.
He says, for example, the number of letters in the women's names totals fourteen which is correct but that's only because Mary (a major character, no?)appears in the final six verses so she's not counted.
Would you not think the hidden message, if true, would have included the mother of Christ?
You don't think it's because the theory falls apart do you?
Latest Posts
Chicken Drumstick, Pork Pie, Glass Of...
News4 mins ago
Tory Donor Lord Bamford Funds The Reform...
News12 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles15 mins ago
ChatterBank25 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.