Computers0 min ago
God Does Or Does Not Exist
169 Answers
The most fundamental question.
Answer it as you see fit, or ignore it as you see fit.
Answer it as you see fit, or ignore it as you see fit.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Theland - "Search them out for yourself" does not constitute a attempt to engage in debate. It is a lame attempt to avoid it.
Please explain your objection to the explanation I posed about how a tiny rate of genetic change of only one in tens of thousands of matings can result in chimps and humans descending from a common ancestor.
If you are not able to summon the answer from your memory then YOU should go and do the research and explain the objections here.
If you cannot do that then you have definitely lost this debate.
Please explain your objection to the explanation I posed about how a tiny rate of genetic change of only one in tens of thousands of matings can result in chimps and humans descending from a common ancestor.
If you are not able to summon the answer from your memory then YOU should go and do the research and explain the objections here.
If you cannot do that then you have definitely lost this debate.
Beso - If winning and losing a debate is so important to you, then I feel sorry for you.
It matters not to me.
I have investigated evolution and spent considerable time weighing up the arguments for and against.
I am satisfied that Darwin and Dawkins are wrong.
Micro evolution, yes, but macro evolution, definitely no.
It matters not to me.
I have investigated evolution and spent considerable time weighing up the arguments for and against.
I am satisfied that Darwin and Dawkins are wrong.
Micro evolution, yes, but macro evolution, definitely no.
https:/ /youtu. be/O6KP L_R4QRA
This video, (you don't have to watch it - for reference only), proves that evolution from ape to man is a fallacy.
Evolution is a philosophy and not a science, as the scientific method cannot be applied to it.
Evolutionists rely on assumptions, suppositions and guesswork. A total fallacy.
The bible does not talk about species, but, "kinds," a big difference.
This video, (you don't have to watch it - for reference only), proves that evolution from ape to man is a fallacy.
Evolution is a philosophy and not a science, as the scientific method cannot be applied to it.
Evolutionists rely on assumptions, suppositions and guesswork. A total fallacy.
The bible does not talk about species, but, "kinds," a big difference.
Theland //Your examples are weak and depend on assumptions and suppositions.
They are worthless and are not proof of evolution.//
Please point out specifically which things I posted are assumptions and suppositions.
You don't seem to understand that debate requires more than simply claiming that I am wrong and my examples are worthless without addressing the specifics.
You have provided no evidence.
They are worthless and are not proof of evolution.//
Please point out specifically which things I posted are assumptions and suppositions.
You don't seem to understand that debate requires more than simply claiming that I am wrong and my examples are worthless without addressing the specifics.
You have provided no evidence.
Theland, The video you’ve posted here is almost an hour and a half long – and you say it’s for reference only. For those reluctant to spend a considerable amount of time watching it, which bit in particular are we supposed to refer to? If you’re learning anything at all from these videos, surely you are capable of conveying the information they contain and conducting a meaningful conversation.